ABUSE.MOM
THREAT REPORT

IP Threat Report
173.232.124.136

ABUSE.MOM — BEHAVE OR GET EXPOSED

Generated: 2026-05-22 13:02:58
First seen: 2026-04-28 04:00:06
Last seen: 2026-04-28 04:00:06
105

⛔ Verdict: BLOCK

This IP address has been classified as a source of malicious automated activity. Threat score: 105/100. Total malicious requests observed: 1.

DANGER_PATHRATIO_404REDIRECT_PROBEREFERER
01

Geolocation & Classification

IP Address
173.232.124.136
Type
Residential
Country
🇺🇸 United States
City
Dallas
ISP
Eonix Corporation
Organization
LinkGrid LLC
Autonomous System
AS62904 Eonix Corporation
Hit Count
1
02

Detection Signatures

SignatureDescriptionPointsSeverity
Danger medium hits: 10Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
404 ratio 40-60%Majority of requests returned 404 — enumeration+15
Probe pattern 302->404 same pathBehavioral anomaly detected by automated analysis+20
Foreign referer seenReferer from unrelated external domain+10
Σ = 105
03

Observed Activity

Reconstructed HTTP requests from server access logs. Target domains redacted for security.

[redacted]
GET
/
200
Requests shown: 1 · HTTP 404: 0 · Dangerous patterns: 0

* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.

04

Timeline

2026-04-28 04:00:06
First malicious request detected
IP entered monitoring from server access logs
During observation
Multiple detection signatures triggered
Danger medium hits: 10 (+60), 404 ratio 40-60% (+15), Probe pattern 302->404 same path (+20)
2026-04-28 04:00:06
Last malicious request observed
Total score reached: 105/100
Next cycle
IP blocked — all subsequent requests denied (HTTP 403)
Added to blocklist automatically
05

Network Provider

Eonix Corporation
AS62904 · 🇺🇸 United States
06

Recommendations

Actions taken & recommended

  • IP 173.232.124.136 is blocked at application level (HTTP 403)
  • Consider blocking at firewall level (iptables/CSF) to reduce server load
  • Report abuse to the network provider via their abuse contact
  • Ensure sensitive files (.env, .git, backups) are not accessible from the web

🔎 Path Enumeration Protection

Block scanning from 173.232.124.136: rate-limit 404 responses per IP, deploy a honeypot 404 page, ensure no backup files are web-accessible.

08

Open Ports & Services

Network reconnaissance data from Shodan. Open ports may indicate running services, misconfigurations, or potential attack surfaces.

OPEN PORTS (6)
PortServiceRiskDescription
80HTTPLowHTTP web server — standard web traffic
3128UnknownLowService on port 3128
8000UnknownLowService on port 8000
8080HTTP-AltLowHTTP alternative port — often used for admin panels or proxies
8800UnknownLowService on port 8800
52931UnknownLowService on port 52931
KNOWN VULNERABILITIES (CVE) (59)
CVE IDLink
CVE-2023-49285NVD →
CVE-2024-45802NVD →
CVE-2026-33526NVD →
CVE-2019-18677NVD →
CVE-2021-28652NVD →
CVE-2016-4553NVD →
CVE-2020-15049NVD →
CVE-2020-14058NVD →
CVE-2026-33515NVD →
CVE-2021-28116NVD →
CVE-2025-54574NVD →
CVE-2016-3947NVD →
CVE-2020-8449NVD →
CVE-2019-13345NVD →
CVE-2016-10002NVD →
CVE-2020-24606NVD →
CVE-2021-31806NVD →
CVE-2019-18679NVD →
CVE-2019-18676NVD →
CVE-2023-46846NVD →
CVE-2019-12522NVD →
CVE-2020-11945NVD →
CVE-2019-12524NVD →
CVE-2020-15810NVD →
CVE-2023-49286NVD →
+34 more

🔴 This host has 59 known CVEs associated with its exposed services. This volume strongly suggests severely outdated software. Review each CVE in the NVD database.

DETECTED TECHNOLOGIES
squid-cache:squid:3.1.23

Data source: Shodan InternetDB. Scanned independently of abuse.mom.

09

Blacklist Status (DNSBL)

This IP was checked against major DNS-based blacklists used by mail servers and firewalls worldwide.

✓ Clean
ix.dnsbl.manitu.net
✓ Clean
dnsbl.sorbs.net
✓ Clean
bl.spamcop.net
✓ Clean
zen.spamhaus.org
✓ Clean
b.barracudacentral.org
✓ Clean
psbl.surriel.com
✓ Clean
truncate.gbudb.net
✓ Clean
dnsbl-1.uceprotect.net

Checked: Spamhaus, SpamCop, Barracuda, SORBS, CBL, UCEProtect. Results may change over time.

10

Threat Analysis

173.232.124.136 has been assigned a threat score of 105/100 (Critical). This places it in the critical threat category. Immediate blocking is strongly advised across all network perimeters.

The following attack categories were identified:

Path Enumeration

📊 Threat Analysis

173.232.124.136 is registered in Dallas, United States, operating on the network of Eonix Corporation. This IP first appeared in our threat feeds after triggering multiple behavioral detection signatures. Our sensors captured 1 malicious requests from this address across a 1-day span, reflecting a sustained attack cadence of ~1 requests per day. Operating from a residential network, this IP may represent a compromised home gateway or IoT device that has been drafted into a larger attack infrastructure. Active path scanning has been detected — this IP probes for hundreds of common file and directory names. United States currently accounts for 133 blocked IPs in our database, making it a significant source of malicious traffic. At 105/100, this is an extremely high-risk address. All traffic should be considered hostile.

This IP is classified as residential, suggesting it may belong to a compromised home device, IoT botnet member, or an infected personal computer. Residential IPs involved in attacks often indicate malware infection without the owner's knowledge.

11

Related Threats

🇺🇸 Top threats from United States

104.28.246.115 (350)104.28.246.113 (340)104.28.246.116 (340)104.28.235.58 (340)104.28.246.122 (340)View all →

🏢 Same network: AS62904

170.130.163.233 (165)170.130.163.94 (165)107.158.200.191 (105)104.206.162.86 (105)107.158.200.144 (105)View all →
12

Security Intelligence

💡 SQL Injection Campaigns

SQL injection remains one of the most common web attack vectors. Attackers inject malicious SQL code through input fields to extract database contents, modify data, or gain administrative access. Automated scanners test for SQLi vulnerabilities at massive scale.

💡 GeoIP Blocking Considerations

Blocking traffic from specific countries reduces attack surface but impacts legitimate international users. Effective geo-based policies use tiered approaches — blocking, rate limiting, or requiring additional verification based on risk assessment.

🔍 Check Any IP Address

Share this report: