ABUSE.MOM
THREAT REPORT

IP Threat Report
172.245.80.67

ABUSE.MOM — BEHAVE OR GET EXPOSED

Generated: 2026-05-21 20:32:50
First seen: 2026-04-17 04:00:05
Last seen: 2026-05-10 08:00:05
110

⛔ Verdict: BLOCK

This IP address has been classified as a source of malicious automated activity. Threat score: 110/100. Total malicious requests observed: 38.

DANGER_PATHRATIO_404REDIRECT_PROBEREFERERUA_CHANGED
01

Geolocation & Classification

IP Address
172.245.80.67
Type
Residential
Country
🇺🇸 United States
City
Buffalo
ISP
HostPapa
Organization
Lixux OU (VATID )
Autonomous System
AS36352 HostPapa
Hit Count
38
02

Detection Signatures

SignatureDescriptionPointsSeverity
Danger medium hits: 2Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+20
404 ratio 40-60%Majority of requests returned 404 — enumeration+15
Probe pattern 302->404 same pathBehavioral anomaly detected by automated analysis+20
Foreign referer seenReferer from unrelated external domain+10
UA changed for same IPMultiple User-Agents — bot rotation technique+25
Danger medium hits: 4Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+40
Σ = 130
03

Observed Activity

Reconstructed HTTP requests from server access logs. Target domains redacted for security.

[redacted]
GET
/
200
Requests shown: 1 · HTTP 404: 0 · Dangerous patterns: 0

* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.

04

Timeline

2026-04-17 04:00:05
First malicious request detected
IP entered monitoring from server access logs
During observation
Multiple detection signatures triggered
Danger medium hits: 2 (+20), 404 ratio 40-60% (+15), Probe pattern 302->404 same path (+20)
2026-05-10 08:00:05
Last malicious request observed
Total score reached: 110/100
Next cycle
IP blocked — all subsequent requests denied (HTTP 403)
Added to blocklist automatically
05

Network Provider

HostPapa
AS36352 · 🇺🇸 United States
06

Recommendations

Actions taken & recommended

  • IP 172.245.80.67 is blocked at application level (HTTP 403)
  • Consider blocking at firewall level (iptables/CSF) to reduce server load
  • Other malicious IPs detected in the same /24 subnet — consider blocking 172.245.80.0/24
  • Report abuse to the network provider via their abuse contact
  • Ensure sensitive files (.env, .git, backups) are not accessible from the web

🔎 Directory Scan Defense

IP 172.245.80.67 is enumerating directories. Configure fail2ban apache-404 jail after 10+ 404 errors. Disable directory listings. Normalize all 404 responses.

🤖 User-Agent Anomaly Defense

IP 172.245.80.67 shows suspicious UA behavior. Block empty User-Agent requests. Implement JavaScript-based bot detection for sensitive endpoints.

07

Neighbors in 172.245.80.0/24

Other blocked IPs from the same /24 subnet — indicates systematic abuse from this network range.

08

Open Ports & Services

Network reconnaissance data from Shodan. Open ports may indicate running services, misconfigurations, or potential attack surfaces.

OPEN PORTS (3)
PortServiceRiskDescription
4444UnknownLowService on port 4444
7777UnknownLowService on port 7777
44444UnknownLowService on port 44444
KNOWN VULNERABILITIES (CVE) (8)
CVE IDLink
CVE-2019-20372NVD →
CVE-2025-23419NVD →
CVE-2019-9516NVD →
CVE-2021-3618NVD →
CVE-2023-44487NVD →
CVE-2019-9511NVD →
CVE-2019-9513NVD →
CVE-2021-23017NVD →

🔴 This host has 8 known CVEs associated with its exposed services. Multiple vulnerabilities suggest gaps in patch management. Review each CVE in the NVD database.

DETECTED TECHNOLOGIES
f5:nginx:1.16.0
Hostnames: 172-245-80-67-host.colocrossing.com
PTR: 172-245-80-67-host.colocrossing.com

Data source: Shodan InternetDB. Scanned independently of abuse.mom.

09

Blacklist Status (DNSBL)

This IP was checked against major DNS-based blacklists used by mail servers and firewalls worldwide.

✓ Clean
ix.dnsbl.manitu.net
✓ Clean
dnsbl.sorbs.net
✓ Clean
bl.spamcop.net
✓ Clean
zen.spamhaus.org
✓ Clean
b.barracudacentral.org
✓ Clean
psbl.surriel.com
✓ Clean
truncate.gbudb.net
✓ Clean
dnsbl-1.uceprotect.net

Checked: Spamhaus, SpamCop, Barracuda, SORBS, CBL, UCEProtect. Results may change over time.

10

Threat Analysis

172.245.80.67 has been assigned a threat score of 110/100 (Critical). A score this high marks a critical threat actor. This address has demonstrated persistent, aggressive malicious behavior across multiple detection vectors.

The following attack categories were identified:

Path EnumerationUser-Agent Anomaly

📊 Threat Analysis

The address 172.245.80.67 originates from Buffalo, United States, operating on the network of HostPapa. It was identified through automated analysis of incoming network traffic across monitored endpoints. During its 23-day observation window, we recorded 38 hostile requests from this IP — roughly 1.7 per day on average. Operating from a residential network, this IP may represent a compromised home gateway or IoT device that has been drafted into a larger attack infrastructure. Two attack patterns were identified (Path Enumeration and User-Agent Anomaly), suggesting a semi-automated campaign that targets multiple vulnerabilities. With 201 flagged addresses, United States represents a significant presence in our threat database. With a threat score of 110/100, this IP is among the most dangerous addresses in our database. Immediate and complete blocking is strongly recommended.

This IP is classified as residential, suggesting it may belong to a compromised home device, IoT botnet member, or an infected personal computer. Residential IPs involved in attacks often indicate malware infection without the owner's knowledge.

11

Related Threats

🇺🇸 Top threats from United States

104.28.246.115 (350)104.28.246.113 (340)104.28.246.116 (340)104.28.235.58 (340)104.28.246.122 (340)View all →

🏢 Same network: AS36352

23.94.40.119 (318)172.245.95.40 (280)23.94.28.183 (255)192.227.215.35 (255)172.245.214.62 (245)View all →
12

Security Intelligence

💡 API Abuse and Enumeration

Modern attacks increasingly target APIs rather than traditional web interfaces. Attackers enumerate endpoints, test for broken authentication, and exploit excessive data exposure. API attacks are harder to detect as they mimic legitimate programmatic access patterns.

💡 Container Security Challenges

Containerized applications face unique security challenges including vulnerable base images, excessive privileges, shared kernel attacks, and insecure orchestration configurations. Runtime security monitoring and immutable container policies mitigate these risks.

🔍 Check Any IP Address

Share this report: