ABUSE.MOM
THREAT REPORT

IP Threat Report
172.233.92.80

ABUSE.MOM — BEHAVE OR GET EXPOSED

Generated: 2026-07-30 01:22:16
First seen: 2026-07-16 15:49:57
Last seen: 2026-07-19 04:09:43
80

⛔ Verdict: BLOCK

This IP address has been classified as a source of malicious automated activity. Threat score: 80/100. Total malicious requests observed: 3918.

BURSTRATIO_404REFERER
01

Geolocation & Classification

IP Address
172.233.92.80
Type
Hosting
Country
🇯🇵 Japan
City
Osaka
ISP
Akamai Technologies, Inc.
Organization
Akamai Technologies, Inc.
Autonomous System
AS63949 Akamai Connected Cloud
Hit Count
3918
02

Detection Signatures

SignatureDescriptionPointsSeverity
404 ratio 40-60%Majority of requests returned 404 — enumeration+15
404 ratio >= 60%Majority of requests returned 404 — enumeration+25
Burst 10/2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 11/2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 13/10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 5/2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 8/2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Foreign refererReferer from unrelated external domain+10
Σ = 225
03

Observed Activity

Reconstructed HTTP requests from server access logs. Target domains redacted for security.

[redacted]
GET
/
200
[redacted]
GET
/page
200
Requests shown: 2 · HTTP 404: 0 · Dangerous patterns: 0

* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.

04

Timeline

2026-07-16 15:49:57
First malicious request detected
IP entered monitoring from server access logs
During observation
Multiple detection signatures triggered
404 ratio 40-60% (+15), 404 ratio >= 60% (+25), Burst 10/2s (+35)
2026-07-19 04:09:43
Last malicious request observed
Total score reached: 80/100
Next cycle
IP blocked — all subsequent requests denied (HTTP 403)
Added to blocklist automatically
05

Network Provider

Akamai Technologies, Inc.
AS63949 · 🇯🇵 Japan
06

Recommendations

Actions taken & recommended

  • IP 172.233.92.80 is blocked at application level (HTTP 403)
  • Consider blocking at firewall level (iptables/CSF) to reduce server load
  • Report abuse to the network provider via their abuse contact
  • Ensure sensitive files (.env, .git, backups) are not accessible from the web

🔎 Path Enumeration Protection

Block scanning from 172.233.92.80: rate-limit 404 responses per IP, deploy a honeypot 404 page, ensure no backup files are web-accessible.

🌊 Flood / DDoS Mitigation

Implement limit_req_zone in nginx. Deploy CDN with DDoS protection. Configure SYN cookies and connection tracking to throttle 172.233.92.80.

09

Blacklist Status (DNSBL)

This IP was checked against major DNS-based blacklists used by mail servers and firewalls worldwide.

✓ Clean
zen.spamhaus.org
✓ Clean
dnsbl.dronebl.org
✓ Clean
spam.dnsbl.sorbs.net
✓ Clean
cbl.abuseat.org
✓ Clean
psbl.surriel.com

Checked: Spamhaus, SpamCop, Barracuda, SORBS, CBL, UCEProtect. Results may change over time.

10

Threat Analysis

172.233.92.80 has been assigned a threat score of 80/100 (Critical). This represents a critical risk level. Our detection systems have flagged multiple high-confidence indicators of malicious intent from this address.

The following attack categories were identified:

Path EnumerationRequest Flooding

📊 Threat Analysis

Our monitoring infrastructure has identified 172.233.92.80, geolocated to Osaka, Japan, operating on the network of Akamai Technologies, Inc., as a source of suspicious network activity. Our sensors captured 3,918 malicious requests from this address across a 2-day span, reflecting a sustained attack cadence of ~1959 requests per day. Operating from datacenter infrastructure, this IP is typical of addresses used in organized attack operations. Cloud and VPS providers are commonly exploited as launching platforms for automated scanning. Two attack patterns were identified (Path Enumeration and Request Flooding), suggesting a semi-automated campaign that targets multiple vulnerabilities. The score of 80/100 indicates a confirmed malicious actor. Network-level blocking is appropriate.

This IP belongs to a hosting or data center provider. Malicious traffic from hosting infrastructure often originates from compromised VPS instances, rented servers used for scanning campaigns, or abused free-tier cloud accounts. Hosting providers typically respond to abuse reports within 24-72 hours.

11

Related Threats

🇯🇵 Top threats from Japan

View all →

🏢 Same network: AS63949

172.235.133.193 (240)97.107.128.157 (240)173.255.253.10 (240)69.164.214.57 (225)192.155.89.179 (225)View all →
12

Security Intelligence

💡 DDoS Mitigation Approaches

Distributed denial of service attacks overwhelm infrastructure with traffic volume. Effective mitigation combines always-on traffic scrubbing, anycast network distribution, rate limiting, and the ability to quickly scale absorption capacity during attacks.

💡 Subdomain Takeover Vulnerabilities

Subdomain takeover occurs when DNS records point to decommissioned services. Attackers claim the abandoned resource and serve content under the trusted domain, enabling cookie theft, phishing, and reputation damage.

🔍 Check Any IP Address

Share this report: