ABUSE.MOM
THREAT REPORT

IP Threat Report
172.121.211.78

ABUSE.MOM — BEHAVE OR GET EXPOSED

Generated: 2026-05-30 07:30:57
First seen: 2026-02-17 17:25:08
Last seen: 2026-02-17 17:26:16
60

⛔ Verdict: BLOCK

This IP address has been classified as a source of malicious automated activity. Threat score: 60/100. Total malicious requests observed: 3.

DANGER_PATHRATIO_404REFERERIMPORT
01

Geolocation & Classification

IP Address
172.121.211.78
Type
Hosting
Country
🇺🇸 United States
City
Santa Clara
ISP
GTT Communications Inc.
Organization
EGIHosting
Autonomous System
AS3257 GTT Communications Inc.
Hit Count
3
02

Detection Signatures

SignatureDescriptionPointsSeverity
Danger strong hits: 1High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+25
404 ratio >= 60%Majority of requests returned 404 — enumeration+25
Foreign referer seenReferer from unrelated external domain+10
Imported from old blocklistBehavioral anomaly detected by automated analysis+0
Σ = 60
03

Observed Activity

Reconstructed HTTP requests from server access logs. Target domains redacted for security.

[redacted]
GET
/
200
Requests shown: 1 · HTTP 404: 0 · Dangerous patterns: 0

* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.

04

Timeline

2026-02-17 17:25:08
First malicious request detected
IP entered monitoring from server access logs
During observation
Multiple detection signatures triggered
Danger strong hits: 1 (+25), 404 ratio >= 60% (+25), Foreign referer seen (+10)
2026-02-17 17:26:16
Last malicious request observed
Total score reached: 60/100
Next cycle
IP blocked — all subsequent requests denied (HTTP 403)
Added to blocklist automatically
05

Network Provider

GTT Communications Inc.
AS3257 · 🇺🇸 United States
06

Recommendations

Actions taken & recommended

  • IP 172.121.211.78 is blocked at application level (HTTP 403)
  • Consider blocking at firewall level (iptables/CSF) to reduce server load
  • Other malicious IPs detected in the same /24 subnet — consider blocking 172.121.211.0/24
  • Report abuse to the network provider via their abuse contact
  • Ensure sensitive files (.env, .git, backups) are not accessible from the web

🔎 Path Enumeration Protection

Block scanning from 172.121.211.78: rate-limit 404 responses per IP, deploy a honeypot 404 page, ensure no backup files are web-accessible.

07

Neighbors in 172.121.211.0/24

Other blocked IPs from the same /24 subnet — indicates systematic abuse from this network range.

08

Open Ports & Services

Network reconnaissance data from Shodan. Open ports may indicate running services, misconfigurations, or potential attack surfaces.

OPEN PORTS (1)
PortServiceRiskDescription
40000UnknownLowService on port 40000

Data source: Shodan InternetDB. Scanned independently of abuse.mom.

09

Blacklist Status (DNSBL)

This IP was checked against major DNS-based blacklists used by mail servers and firewalls worldwide.

⛔ LISTED
Spamhaus ZEN

Checked: Spamhaus, SpamCop, Barracuda, SORBS, CBL, UCEProtect. Results may change over time.

10

Threat Analysis

172.121.211.78 has been assigned a threat score of 60/100 (High). At this threat level, the IP is considered high risk. Firewall rules should be updated to deny traffic from this source.

The following attack categories were identified:

Path Enumeration

📊 Threat Analysis

172.121.211.78 is registered in Santa Clara, United States, operating on the network of GTT Communications Inc.. This IP first appeared in our threat feeds after triggering multiple behavioral detection signatures. The address has been active for 1 days in our monitoring system, producing 3 flagged requests at a rate of ~3/day. This address belongs to a datacenter or cloud hosting provider. Hosting IPs are frequently leveraged by threat actors who rent cheap VPS instances specifically for conducting attacks. The IP exhibits directory enumeration behavior, systematically requesting non-existent paths to discover hidden files and misconfigured resources. Our records show 21 malicious IPs originating from United States, positioning it as a notable contributor to global threat activity. At 60/100, this IP presents a meaningful threat. Implement rate limiting with escalation to blocking.

This IP belongs to a hosting or data center provider. Malicious traffic from hosting infrastructure often originates from compromised VPS instances, rented servers used for scanning campaigns, or abused free-tier cloud accounts. Hosting providers typically respond to abuse reports within 24-72 hours.

11

Related Threats

🇺🇸 Top threats from United States

64.57.129.39 (130)45.41.174.207 (130)134.195.153.64 (105)45.41.166.41 (105)207.97.130.53 (105)View all →

🏢 Same network: AS3257

64.57.129.39 (130)45.41.174.207 (130)134.195.153.64 (105)45.41.166.41 (105)207.97.130.53 (105)View all →
12

Security Intelligence

💡 Brute Force Attack Mechanics

Brute force attacks systematically try username and password combinations to gain unauthorized access. Modern attacks leverage credential databases from previous breaches, testing millions of combinations using distributed botnets across multiple IP addresses.

💡 Automated Incident Response

Automated response systems can block threats in milliseconds, far faster than human analysts. However, automation requires careful safeguards — rate limits on blocking actions, automatic expiration, and human review queues prevent automated systems from causing self-inflicted outages.

🔍 Check Any IP Address

Share this report: