ABUSE.MOM
THREAT REPORT

IP Threat Report
172.120.26.38

ABUSE.MOM — BEHAVE OR GET EXPOSED

Generated: 2026-05-30 07:30:57
First seen: 2026-02-19 22:45:07
Last seen: 2026-02-19 22:45:07
60

⛔ Verdict: BLOCK

This IP address has been classified as a source of malicious automated activity. Threat score: 60/100. Total malicious requests observed: 1.

DANGER_PATHRATIO_404REFERER
01

Geolocation & Classification

IP Address
172.120.26.38
Type
Hosting
Country
🇺🇸 United States
City
Santa Clara
ISP
GTT Communications Inc.
Organization
EGIHosting
Autonomous System
AS3257 GTT Communications Inc.
Hit Count
1
02

Detection Signatures

SignatureDescriptionPointsSeverity
Danger strong hits: 1High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+25
404 ratio >= 60%Majority of requests returned 404 — enumeration+25
Foreign referer seenReferer from unrelated external domain+10
Σ = 60
03

Observed Activity

Reconstructed HTTP requests from server access logs. Target domains redacted for security.

[redacted]
GET
/
200
Requests shown: 1 · HTTP 404: 0 · Dangerous patterns: 0

* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.

04

Timeline

2026-02-19 22:45:07
First malicious request detected
IP entered monitoring from server access logs
During observation
Multiple detection signatures triggered
Danger strong hits: 1 (+25), 404 ratio >= 60% (+25), Foreign referer seen (+10)
2026-02-19 22:45:07
Last malicious request observed
Total score reached: 60/100
Next cycle
IP blocked — all subsequent requests denied (HTTP 403)
Added to blocklist automatically
05

Network Provider

GTT Communications Inc.
AS3257 · 🇺🇸 United States
06

Recommendations

Actions taken & recommended

  • IP 172.120.26.38 is blocked at application level (HTTP 403)
  • Consider blocking at firewall level (iptables/CSF) to reduce server load
  • Report abuse to the network provider via their abuse contact
  • Ensure sensitive files (.env, .git, backups) are not accessible from the web

🔎 Path Enumeration Protection

Block scanning from 172.120.26.38: rate-limit 404 responses per IP, deploy a honeypot 404 page, ensure no backup files are web-accessible.

08

Open Ports & Services

Network reconnaissance data from Shodan. Open ports may indicate running services, misconfigurations, or potential attack surfaces.

OPEN PORTS (1)
PortServiceRiskDescription
1180UnknownLowService on port 1180

Data source: Shodan InternetDB. Scanned independently of abuse.mom.

09

Blacklist Status (DNSBL)

This IP was checked against major DNS-based blacklists used by mail servers and firewalls worldwide.

⛔ LISTED
Spamhaus ZEN

Checked: Spamhaus, SpamCop, Barracuda, SORBS, CBL, UCEProtect. Results may change over time.

10

Threat Analysis

172.120.26.38 has been assigned a threat score of 60/100 (High). This score indicates high threat severity. The IP has shown clear patterns of malicious behavior that warrant immediate defensive measures.

The following attack categories were identified:

Path Enumeration

📊 Threat Analysis

Threat intelligence analysis has linked 172.120.26.38 to malicious activity originating from Santa Clara, United States, operating on the network of GTT Communications Inc.. The address has been under observation since its initial detection. Our sensors captured 1 malicious requests from this address across a 1-day span, reflecting a sustained attack cadence of ~1 requests per day. The IP is classified as hosting/datacenter infrastructure, commonly associated with rented servers used for automated attack campaigns, botnet command-and-control, or vulnerability scanning at scale. The IP exhibits directory enumeration behavior, systematically requesting non-existent paths to discover hidden files and misconfigured resources. With 21 flagged addresses, United States represents a notable presence in our threat database. The score of 60/100 warrants active monitoring and rate-limiting. Full blocking is advisable for sensitive systems.

This IP belongs to a hosting or data center provider. Malicious traffic from hosting infrastructure often originates from compromised VPS instances, rented servers used for scanning campaigns, or abused free-tier cloud accounts. Hosting providers typically respond to abuse reports within 24-72 hours.

11

Related Threats

🇺🇸 Top threats from United States

64.57.129.39 (130)45.41.174.207 (130)134.195.153.64 (105)45.41.166.41 (105)207.97.130.53 (105)View all →

🏢 Same network: AS3257

64.57.129.39 (130)45.41.174.207 (130)134.195.153.64 (105)45.41.166.41 (105)207.97.130.53 (105)View all →
12

Security Intelligence

💡 WordPress-Specific Attack Vectors

WordPress sites face constant automated attacks targeting xmlrpc.php for brute force amplification, wp-login.php for credential theft, and vulnerable plugins for remote code execution. Over 90% of CMS-based attacks specifically target WordPress installations.

💡 Cryptojacking Detection and Prevention

Cryptojacking hijacks computing resources to mine cryptocurrency without consent. Indicators include unusual CPU usage, specific network connections to mining pools, and JavaScript miners embedded in compromised websites. Server-side cryptojacking can persist undetected for months.

🔍 Check Any IP Address

Share this report: