ABUSE.MOM
THREAT REPORT

IP Threat Report
170.101.96.54

ABUSE.MOM — BEHAVE OR GET EXPOSED

Generated: 2026-09-13 02:47:39
First seen: 2026-08-23 15:18:48
Last seen: 2026-09-06 01:03:53
60

⛔ Verdict: BLOCK

This IP address has been classified as a source of malicious automated activity. Threat score: 60/100. Total malicious requests observed: 216.

BURSTUA_CHANGED
01

Geolocation & Classification

IP Address
170.101.96.54
Type
Hosting
Country
🇺🇸 United States
City
Chicago
ISP
GTHost
Organization
GTHost
Autonomous System
AS63023 GTHost
Hit Count
216
02

Detection Signatures

SignatureDescriptionPointsSeverity
Burst 8/2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
UA changedMultiple User-Agents — bot rotation technique+25
Σ = 60
03

Observed Activity

Reconstructed HTTP requests from server access logs. Target domains redacted for security.

[redacted]
GET
/
200
[redacted]
GET
/page
200
Requests shown: 2 · HTTP 404: 0 · Dangerous patterns: 0

* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.

04

Timeline

2026-08-23 15:18:48
First malicious request detected
IP entered monitoring from server access logs
During observation
Multiple detection signatures triggered
Burst 8/2s (+35), UA changed (+25)
2026-09-06 01:03:53
Last malicious request observed
Total score reached: 60/100
Next cycle
IP blocked — all subsequent requests denied (HTTP 403)
Added to blocklist automatically
05

Network Provider

GTHost
AS63023 · 🇺🇸 United States
06

Recommendations

Actions taken & recommended

  • IP 170.101.96.54 is blocked at application level (HTTP 403)
  • Consider blocking at firewall level (iptables/CSF) to reduce server load
  • Other malicious IPs detected in the same /24 subnet — consider blocking 170.101.96.0/24
  • Report abuse to the network provider via their abuse contact
  • Ensure sensitive files (.env, .git, backups) are not accessible from the web

🌊 Flood / DDoS Mitigation

Implement limit_req_zone in nginx. Deploy CDN with DDoS protection. Configure SYN cookies and connection tracking to throttle 170.101.96.54.

🤖 Bot Detection

Address UA spoofing from 170.101.96.54: maintain blocklist of known malicious UA strings, require consistent UA across sessions, implement TLS fingerprinting.

07

Neighbors in 170.101.96.0/24

Other blocked IPs from the same /24 subnet — indicates systematic abuse from this network range.

09

Blacklist Status (DNSBL)

This IP was checked against major DNS-based blacklists used by mail servers and firewalls worldwide.

✓ Clean
cbl.abuseat.org
✓ Clean
spam.dnsbl.sorbs.net
✓ Clean
bl.blocklist.de
✓ Clean
zen.spamhaus.org
✓ Clean
b.barracudacentral.org
✓ Clean
dnsbl.dronebl.org
✓ Clean
psbl.surriel.com

Checked: Spamhaus, SpamCop, Barracuda, SORBS, CBL, UCEProtect. Results may change over time.

10

Threat Analysis

170.101.96.54 has been assigned a threat score of 60/100 (High). This score indicates high threat severity. The IP has shown clear patterns of malicious behavior that warrant immediate defensive measures.

The following attack categories were identified:

Request FloodingUser-Agent Anomaly

📊 Threat Analysis

Network traffic from 170.101.96.54, located in Chicago, United States, operating on the network of GTHost, has been classified as malicious by our automated threat scoring engine. The address has been active for 13 days in our monitoring system, producing 216 flagged requests at a rate of ~16.6/day. The IP is classified as hosting/datacenter infrastructure, commonly associated with rented servers used for automated attack campaigns, botnet command-and-control, or vulnerability scanning at scale. Two attack patterns were identified (Request Flooding and User-Agent Anomaly), suggesting a semi-automated campaign that targets multiple vulnerabilities. Our records show 110 malicious IPs originating from United States, positioning it as a significant contributor to global threat activity. At 60/100, this IP presents a meaningful threat. Implement rate limiting with escalation to blocking.

This IP belongs to a hosting or data center provider. Malicious traffic from hosting infrastructure often originates from compromised VPS instances, rented servers used for scanning campaigns, or abused free-tier cloud accounts. Hosting providers typically respond to abuse reports within 24-72 hours.

11

Related Threats

🇺🇸 Top threats from United States

104.28.246.115 (350)104.28.214.122 (350)216.73.160.52 (350)34.187.158.4 (340)34.186.187.208 (340)View all →

🏢 Same network: AS63023

216.106.180.226 (165)216.106.191.187 (130)67.220.95.36 (130)66.163.118.99 (95)193.106.249.104 (80)View all →
12

Security Intelligence

💡 DDoS Mitigation Approaches

Distributed denial of service attacks overwhelm infrastructure with traffic volume. Effective mitigation combines always-on traffic scrubbing, anycast network distribution, rate limiting, and the ability to quickly scale absorption capacity during attacks.

💡 Web Cache Poisoning Attacks

Cache poisoning manipulates web cache behavior to serve malicious content to other users. By identifying unkeyed inputs that influence cached responses, attackers can inject JavaScript, redirect users, or cause denial of service at scale through the cache infrastructure.

🔍 Check Any IP Address

Share this report: