
ABUSE.MOM — BEHAVE OR GET EXPOSED
| Signature | Description | Points | Severity |
|---|---|---|---|
| UA changed for same IP | Multiple User-Agents — bot rotation technique | +25 | |
| Danger strong hits: 4 | High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits | +100 | |
| Danger medium hits: 3 | Medium-risk: admin panels, config files | +30 | |
| 404 ratio >= 60% | Majority of requests returned 404 — enumeration | +25 | |
| Probe pattern 302->404 same path | Behavioral anomaly detected by automated analysis | +20 | |
| Foreign referer seen | Referer from unrelated external domain | +10 | |
| Danger strong hits: 6 | High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits | +100 | |
| 404 ratio 40-60% | Majority of requests returned 404 — enumeration | +15 | |
| Burst: 6 req / 2s | Abnormally fast request rate — automated scanning | +35 |
Reconstructed HTTP requests from server access logs. Target domains redacted for security.
* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.
IP 165.22.240.105 shows suspicious UA behavior. Block empty User-Agent requests. Implement JavaScript-based bot detection for sensitive endpoints.
Block scanning from 165.22.240.105: rate-limit 404 responses per IP, deploy a honeypot 404 page, ensure no backup files are web-accessible.
Implement limit_req_zone in nginx. Deploy CDN with DDoS protection. Configure SYN cookies and connection tracking to throttle 165.22.240.105.
Network reconnaissance data from Shodan. Open ports may indicate running services, misconfigurations, or potential attack surfaces.
| Port | Service | Risk | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 22 | SSH | Low | Secure Shell — common brute force target for remote access |
| 10001 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 10001 |
| 10002 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 10002 |
| 10003 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 10003 |
| 10008 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 10008 |
| 10014 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 10014 |
| 10249 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 10249 |
| 10250 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 10250 |
| 10348 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 10348 |
| 11211 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 11211 |
| 12000 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 12000 |
| 12016 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 12016 |
| 12124 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 12124 |
| 12159 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 12159 |
| 12192 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 12192 |
| 12251 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 12251 |
| 12260 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 12260 |
| 12334 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 12334 |
| 12337 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 12337 |
| 12354 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 12354 |
| 12397 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 12397 |
| 12410 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 12410 |
| 12465 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 12465 |
| 12466 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 12466 |
| 12503 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 12503 |
| 12535 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 12535 |
| 12547 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 12547 |
| 12557 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 12557 |
| 12571 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 12571 |
| 13084 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 13084 |
| 13579 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 13579 |
| 13718 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 13718 |
| 14875 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 14875 |
| 14903 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 14903 |
| 15123 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 15123 |
| 16010 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 16010 |
| 16080 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 16080 |
| 16093 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 16093 |
| 16401 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 16401 |
| 16993 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 16993 |
| 17082 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 17082 |
| 18003 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 18003 |
| 18036 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 18036 |
| 18047 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 18047 |
| 18051 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 18051 |
| 18053 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 18053 |
| 18061 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 18061 |
| 18068 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 18068 |
| 18072 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 18072 |
| 19071 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 19071 |
| 19080 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 19080 |
| 19527 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 19527 |
| 30011 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 30011 |
| 30473 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 30473 |
| 30479 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 30479 |
| 31337 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 31337 |
| 31380 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 31380 |
| 33060 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 33060 |
| 33700 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 33700 |
| 35554 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 35554 |
| 35874 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 35874 |
| 37777 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 37777 |
| 38779 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 38779 |
Data source: Shodan InternetDB. Scanned independently of abuse.mom.
This IP was checked against major DNS-based blacklists used by mail servers and firewalls worldwide.
Checked: Spamhaus, SpamCop, Barracuda, SORBS, CBL, UCEProtect. Results may change over time.
165.22.240.105 has been assigned a threat score of 215/100 (Critical). This places it in the critical threat category. Immediate blocking is strongly advised across all network perimeters.
The following attack categories were identified:
Our monitoring infrastructure has identified 165.22.240.105, geolocated to Singapore, Singapore, operating on the network of DigitalOcean, LLC, as a source of suspicious network activity. Our sensors captured 2 malicious requests from this address across a 1-day span, reflecting a sustained attack cadence of ~2 requests per day. The IP is classified as hosting/datacenter infrastructure, commonly associated with rented servers used for automated attack campaigns, botnet command-and-control, or vulnerability scanning at scale. With 3 different attack patterns detected, this IP exhibits behavior characteristic of advanced automated scanning frameworks. With 41 flagged addresses, Singapore represents a notable presence in our threat database. A score of 215/100 places this address in the top tier of severity. Block and investigate any historical connections.
This IP belongs to a hosting or data center provider. Malicious traffic from hosting infrastructure often originates from compromised VPS instances, rented servers used for scanning campaigns, or abused free-tier cloud accounts. Hosting providers typically respond to abuse reports within 24-72 hours.
Analyzing User-Agent strings reveals automated tools masquerading as legitimate browsers. Inconsistencies between claimed browser capabilities and actual behavior, impossible version combinations, and known scanner signatures help identify malicious clients.
When multiple IPs in a subnet show malicious behavior, subnet blocking efficiently neutralizes the threat. However, overly broad blocking risks impacting legitimate users. Analysis of subnet ownership and historical behavior guides appropriate blocking scope.