ABUSE.MOM
THREAT REPORT

IP Threat Report
160.251.142.232

ABUSE.MOM — BEHAVE OR GET EXPOSED

Generated: 2026-05-22 12:55:33
First seen: 2026-03-13 00:00:06
Last seen: 2026-03-13 00:00:06
70

⛔ Verdict: BLOCK

This IP address has been classified as a source of malicious automated activity. Threat score: 70/100. Total malicious requests observed: 1.

DANGER_PATHREFERER
01

Geolocation & Classification

IP Address
160.251.142.232
Type
Residential
Country
🇯🇵 Japan
City
Chiyoda City
ISP
GMO Internet, Inc
Organization
GMO Internet Group, Inc.
Autonomous System
AS58791 GMO Internet Group, Inc.
Hit Count
1
02

Detection Signatures

SignatureDescriptionPointsSeverity
Danger medium hits: 10Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Foreign referer seenReferer from unrelated external domain+10
Σ = 70
03

Observed Activity

Reconstructed HTTP requests from server access logs. Target domains redacted for security.

[redacted]
GET
/
200
Requests shown: 1 · HTTP 404: 0 · Dangerous patterns: 0

* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.

04

Timeline

2026-03-13 00:00:06
First malicious request detected
IP entered monitoring from server access logs
During observation
Multiple detection signatures triggered
Danger medium hits: 10 (+60), Foreign referer seen (+10)
2026-03-13 00:00:06
Last malicious request observed
Total score reached: 70/100
Next cycle
IP blocked — all subsequent requests denied (HTTP 403)
Added to blocklist automatically
05

Network Provider

GMO Internet, Inc
AS58791 · 🇯🇵 Japan
06

Recommendations

Actions taken & recommended

  • IP 160.251.142.232 is blocked at application level (HTTP 403)
  • Consider blocking at firewall level (iptables/CSF) to reduce server load
  • Report abuse to the network provider via their abuse contact
  • Ensure sensitive files (.env, .git, backups) are not accessible from the web

⚙️ Defensive Recommendations

Block 160.251.142.232 at the network perimeter. Implement defense-in-depth combining IP blocking with application-layer protections.

08

Open Ports & Services

Network reconnaissance data from Shodan. Open ports may indicate running services, misconfigurations, or potential attack surfaces.

OPEN PORTS (3)
PortServiceRiskDescription
22SSHLowSecure Shell — common brute force target for remote access
80HTTPLowHTTP web server — standard web traffic
443HTTPSLowHTTPS web server — encrypted web traffic
DETECTED TECHNOLOGIES
openbsd:openssh:9.6p1canonical:ubuntu_linux
Hostnames: nuko.mz32.dev
PTR: nuko.mz32.dev

Data source: Shodan InternetDB. Scanned independently of abuse.mom.

09

Blacklist Status (DNSBL)

This IP was checked against major DNS-based blacklists used by mail servers and firewalls worldwide.

⛔ LISTED
Spamhaus ZEN

Checked: Spamhaus, SpamCop, Barracuda, SORBS, CBL, UCEProtect. Results may change over time.

10

Threat Analysis

160.251.142.232 has been assigned a threat score of 70/100 (High). At this threat level, the IP is considered high risk. Firewall rules should be updated to deny traffic from this source.

📊 Threat Analysis

Network traffic from 160.251.142.232, located in Chiyoda City, Japan, operating on the network of GMO Internet, Inc, has been classified as malicious by our automated threat scoring engine. Over a period of 1 days, this IP generated 1 malicious requests, averaging approximately 1 requests per day. The address is classified as residential, meaning it likely belongs to an end-user ISP connection. Malicious activity from residential IPs typically indicates device compromise or botnet membership. With 101 flagged addresses, Japan represents a significant presence in our threat database. A threat score of 70/100 places this IP in the high-risk category. Blocking at the firewall level is recommended.

This IP is classified as residential, suggesting it may belong to a compromised home device, IoT botnet member, or an infected personal computer. Residential IPs involved in attacks often indicate malware infection without the owner's knowledge.

11

Related Threats

🇯🇵 Top threats from Japan

103.163.220.216 (340)20.89.56.154 (280)20.27.221.169 (280)20.210.188.132 (280)20.194.153.120 (280)View all →

🏢 Same network: AS58791

View all →
12

Security Intelligence

💡 HTTP Request Smuggling

Request smuggling exploits differences in how front-end and back-end servers parse HTTP requests. This technique can bypass security controls, poison web caches, and hijack other users sessions by desynchronizing request boundaries.

💡 Rate Limiting and Throttling Strategies

Effective rate limiting must balance protection against abuse with allowing legitimate traffic bursts. Sliding window algorithms, token buckets, and adaptive thresholds based on client reputation provide layered defense against flooding attacks.

🔍 Check Any IP Address

Share this report: