ABUSE.MOM
THREAT REPORT

IP Threat Report
159.26.114.12

ABUSE.MOM — BEHAVE OR GET EXPOSED

Generated: 2026-10-25 21:00:54
First seen: 2026-10-25 20:59:06
Last seen: 2026-10-25 20:59:06
70

⛔ Verdict: BLOCK

This IP address has been classified as a source of malicious automated activity. Threat score: 70/100. Total malicious requests observed: 1.

DANGER_PATH
01

Geolocation & Classification

IP Address
159.26.114.12
Type
VPN
Country
🇩🇰 DK
City
Copenhagen
ISP
Proton AG
Organization
PV-SL-HOSTED-Copenhagen
Autonomous System
AS208172 Proton AG
Hit Count
1
02

Detection Signatures

SignatureDescriptionPointsSeverity
Danger strong hits: 2High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+50
Danger medium hits: 2Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+20
Σ = 70
03

Observed Activity

Reconstructed HTTP requests from server access logs. Target domains redacted for security.

[redacted]
GET
/
200
Requests shown: 1 · HTTP 404: 0 · Dangerous patterns: 0

* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.

04

Timeline

2026-10-25 20:59:06
First malicious request detected
IP entered monitoring from server access logs
During observation
Multiple detection signatures triggered
Danger strong hits: 2 (+50), Danger medium hits: 2 (+20)
2026-10-25 20:59:06
Last malicious request observed
Total score reached: 70/100
Next cycle
IP blocked — all subsequent requests denied (HTTP 403)
Added to blocklist automatically
05

Network Provider

Proton AG
AS208172 · 🇩🇰 DK

We have detected 44 malicious IPs from this autonomous system.

View all IPs from AS208172 →
06

Recommendations

Actions taken & recommended

  • IP 159.26.114.12 is blocked at application level (HTTP 403)
  • Consider blocking at firewall level (iptables/CSF) to reduce server load
  • Report abuse to the network provider via their abuse contact
  • Ensure sensitive files (.env, .git, backups) are not accessible from the web

⚙️ Defensive Recommendations

Block 159.26.114.12 at the network perimeter. Implement defense-in-depth combining IP blocking with application-layer protections.

09

Blacklist Status (DNSBL)

This IP was checked against major DNS-based blacklists used by mail servers and firewalls worldwide.

✓ Clean
bl.blocklist.de
✓ Clean
zen.spamhaus.org
✓ Clean
cbl.abuseat.org
✓ Clean
spam.dnsbl.sorbs.net
✓ Clean
dnsbl.dronebl.org
✓ Clean
b.barracudacentral.org
✓ Clean
psbl.surriel.com

Checked: Spamhaus, SpamCop, Barracuda, SORBS, CBL, UCEProtect. Results may change over time.

10

Threat Analysis

159.26.114.12 has been assigned a threat score of 70/100 (High). The IP is rated as a high-level threat. Network administrators should implement blocking rules and monitor for any connections from this address.

📊 Threat Analysis

Our monitoring infrastructure has identified 159.26.114.12, geolocated to Copenhagen, DK, operating on the network of Proton AG, as a source of suspicious network activity. Over a period of 1 days, this IP generated 1 malicious requests, averaging approximately 1 requests per day. This IP is identified as a VPN or proxy endpoint, commonly used to mask the true origin of attack traffic and bypass geographic or reputation-based blocking. With 60 flagged addresses, DK represents a notable presence in our threat database. The score of 70/100 indicates a confirmed malicious actor. Network-level blocking is appropriate.

This IP is associated with a VPN or proxy service. Attackers frequently route their traffic through anonymizing services to obscure their true location. This makes attribution more challenging but the malicious behavior patterns remain detectable.

11

Related Threats

🇩🇰 Top threats from DK

158.173.74.223 (308)85.203.47.13 (295)85.203.47.192 (255)85.203.47.213 (255)85.203.47.6 (245)View all →

🏢 Same network: AS208172

205.147.17.33 (255)159.26.101.60 (255)205.147.17.7 (230)159.26.119.227 (173)159.26.104.42 (165)View all →
12

Security Intelligence

💡 HTTP Request Smuggling

Request smuggling exploits differences in how front-end and back-end servers parse HTTP requests. This technique can bypass security controls, poison web caches, and hijack other users sessions by desynchronizing request boundaries.

💡 GDPR and Threat Intelligence

Processing IP addresses for security purposes under GDPR requires balancing legitimate interest in network protection with data minimization principles. Threat intelligence platforms must implement appropriate retention policies and provide mechanisms for data subject rights.

🔍 Check Any IP Address

Share this report: