ABUSE.MOM
THREAT REPORT

IP Threat Report
158.173.3.36

ABUSE.MOM — BEHAVE OR GET EXPOSED

Generated: 2026-05-22 07:54:57
First seen: 2026-03-20 18:00:05
Last seen: 2026-03-23 12:00:07
165

⛔ Verdict: BLOCK

This IP address has been classified as a source of malicious automated activity. Threat score: 165/100. Total malicious requests observed: 26.

UA_CHANGEDDANGER_PATHRATIO_404REDIRECT_PROBEREFERERBURST
01

Geolocation & Classification

IP Address
158.173.3.36
Type
VPN/Proxy
Country
🇳🇱 Netherlands
City
Amsterdam
ISP
Datacamp Limited
Organization
VPN Consumer Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Autonomous System
AS212238 Datacamp Limited
Hit Count
26
02

Detection Signatures

SignatureDescriptionPointsSeverity
UA changed for same IPMultiple User-Agents — bot rotation technique+25
Danger medium hits: 12Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
404 ratio 40-60%Majority of requests returned 404 — enumeration+15
Probe pattern 302->404 same pathBehavioral anomaly detected by automated analysis+20
Foreign referer seenReferer from unrelated external domain+10
Danger medium hits: 6Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Burst: 5 req / 2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Σ = 225
03

Observed Activity

Reconstructed HTTP requests from server access logs. Target domains redacted for security.

[redacted]
GET
/
200
[redacted]
GET
/page
200
Requests shown: 2 · HTTP 404: 0 · Dangerous patterns: 0

* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.

04

Timeline

2026-03-20 18:00:05
First malicious request detected
IP entered monitoring from server access logs
During observation
Multiple detection signatures triggered
UA changed for same IP (+25), Danger medium hits: 12 (+60), 404 ratio 40-60% (+15)
2026-03-23 12:00:07
Last malicious request observed
Total score reached: 165/100
Next cycle
IP blocked — all subsequent requests denied (HTTP 403)
Added to blocklist automatically
05

Network Provider

Datacamp Limited
AS212238 · 🇳🇱 Netherlands
06

Recommendations

Actions taken & recommended

  • IP 158.173.3.36 is blocked at application level (HTTP 403)
  • Consider blocking at firewall level (iptables/CSF) to reduce server load
  • Other malicious IPs detected in the same /24 subnet — consider blocking 158.173.3.0/24
  • Report abuse to the network provider via their abuse contact
  • Ensure sensitive files (.env, .git, backups) are not accessible from the web

🤖 User-Agent Anomaly Defense

IP 158.173.3.36 shows suspicious UA behavior. Block empty User-Agent requests. Implement JavaScript-based bot detection for sensitive endpoints.

🔎 Path Enumeration Protection

Block scanning from 158.173.3.36: rate-limit 404 responses per IP, deploy a honeypot 404 page, ensure no backup files are web-accessible.

🌊 Flood / DDoS Mitigation

Implement limit_req_zone in nginx. Deploy CDN with DDoS protection. Configure SYN cookies and connection tracking to throttle 158.173.3.36.

07

Neighbors in 158.173.3.0/24

Other blocked IPs from the same /24 subnet — indicates systematic abuse from this network range.

08

Open Ports & Services

Network reconnaissance data from Shodan. Open ports may indicate running services, misconfigurations, or potential attack surfaces.

OPEN PORTS (4)
PortServiceRiskDescription
80HTTPLowHTTP web server — standard web traffic
502UnknownLowService on port 502
1337UnknownLowService on port 1337
8443HTTPS-AltLowService on port 8443

Data source: Shodan InternetDB. Scanned independently of abuse.mom.

09

Blacklist Status (DNSBL)

This IP was checked against major DNS-based blacklists used by mail servers and firewalls worldwide.

✓ Clean
ix.dnsbl.manitu.net
✓ Clean
dnsbl.sorbs.net
✓ Clean
bl.spamcop.net
✓ Clean
dnsbl-1.uceprotect.net
✓ Clean
zen.spamhaus.org
✓ Clean
psbl.surriel.com
✓ Clean
b.barracudacentral.org
✓ Clean
truncate.gbudb.net

Checked: Spamhaus, SpamCop, Barracuda, SORBS, CBL, UCEProtect. Results may change over time.

10

Threat Analysis

158.173.3.36 has been assigned a threat score of 165/100 (Critical). With this rating, the IP falls into the critical severity bracket — among the most dangerous addresses in our monitoring database.

The following attack categories were identified:

User-Agent AnomalyPath EnumerationRequest Flooding

📊 Threat Analysis

158.173.3.36 is registered in Amsterdam, Netherlands, operating on the network of Datacamp Limited. This IP first appeared in our threat feeds after triggering multiple behavioral detection signatures. The address has been active for 2 days in our monitoring system, producing 26 flagged requests at a rate of ~13/day. The address operates as a VPN/proxy exit node. Attackers route traffic through anonymizing services to obscure their real location and evade IP-based security controls. The diversity of 3 separate attack methods suggests a comprehensive attack toolkit — likely an automated scanner that tests for vulnerabilities across multiple categories. Our records show 119 malicious IPs originating from Netherlands, positioning it as a significant contributor to global threat activity. A score of 165/100 places this address in the top tier of severity. Block and investigate any historical connections.

This IP is associated with a VPN or proxy service. Attackers frequently route their traffic through anonymizing services to obscure their true location. This makes attribution more challenging but the malicious behavior patterns remain detectable.

11

Related Threats

🇳🇱 Top threats from Netherlands

185.184.192.251 (338)45.88.138.44 (320)45.82.64.236 (315)5.181.169.192 (313)157.22.73.141 (313)View all →

🏢 Same network: AS212238

212.30.33.72 (305)98.159.233.109 (305)45.91.23.64 (305)84.233.212.3 (295)98.159.233.211 (280)View all →
12

Security Intelligence

💡 HTTP Header Analysis for Threat Detection

Examining HTTP headers beyond User-Agent reveals attack tools and automated scripts. Missing standard headers, unusual ordering, non-standard values, and inconsistencies with claimed client identity all serve as reliable detection signals.

💡 VPN Exit Node Reputation

VPN exit nodes aggregate traffic from many users, creating mixed reputation profiles. While legitimate users seek privacy, attackers exploit VPN services to anonymize malicious activity, making IP-based blocking of VPN nodes a complex policy decision.

🔍 Check Any IP Address

Share this report: