ABUSE.MOM
THREAT REPORT

IP Threat Report
158.173.21.63

ABUSE.MOM — BEHAVE OR GET EXPOSED

Generated: 2026-05-22 12:48:44
First seen: 2026-03-19 22:00:06
Last seen: 2026-03-20 12:00:06
165

⛔ Verdict: BLOCK

This IP address has been classified as a source of malicious automated activity. Threat score: 165/100. Total malicious requests observed: 5.

DANGER_PATHRATIO_404REDIRECT_PROBEBURSTREFERERUA_CHANGED
01

Geolocation & Classification

IP Address
158.173.21.63
Type
VPN/Proxy
Country
🇳🇱 Netherlands
City
Amsterdam
ISP
Datacamp Limited
Organization
VPN Consumer Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Autonomous System
AS212238 Datacamp Limited
Hit Count
5
02

Detection Signatures

SignatureDescriptionPointsSeverity
Danger medium hits: 6Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
404 ratio 40-60%Majority of requests returned 404 — enumeration+15
Probe pattern 302->404 same pathBehavioral anomaly detected by automated analysis+20
Burst: 5 req / 2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Foreign referer seenReferer from unrelated external domain+10
UA changed for same IPMultiple User-Agents — bot rotation technique+25
Danger medium hits: 12Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Σ = 225
03

Observed Activity

Reconstructed HTTP requests from server access logs. Target domains redacted for security.

[redacted]
GET
/
200
[redacted]
GET
/page
200
Requests shown: 2 · HTTP 404: 0 · Dangerous patterns: 0

* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.

04

Timeline

2026-03-19 22:00:06
First malicious request detected
IP entered monitoring from server access logs
During observation
Multiple detection signatures triggered
Danger medium hits: 6 (+60), 404 ratio 40-60% (+15), Probe pattern 302->404 same path (+20)
2026-03-20 12:00:06
Last malicious request observed
Total score reached: 165/100
Next cycle
IP blocked — all subsequent requests denied (HTTP 403)
Added to blocklist automatically
05

Network Provider

Datacamp Limited
AS212238 · 🇳🇱 Netherlands
06

Recommendations

Actions taken & recommended

  • IP 158.173.21.63 is blocked at application level (HTTP 403)
  • Consider blocking at firewall level (iptables/CSF) to reduce server load
  • Other malicious IPs detected in the same /24 subnet — consider blocking 158.173.21.0/24
  • Report abuse to the network provider via their abuse contact
  • Ensure sensitive files (.env, .git, backups) are not accessible from the web

🔎 Path Enumeration Protection

Block scanning from 158.173.21.63: rate-limit 404 responses per IP, deploy a honeypot 404 page, ensure no backup files are web-accessible.

🌊 Flood / DDoS Mitigation

Implement limit_req_zone in nginx. Deploy CDN with DDoS protection. Configure SYN cookies and connection tracking to throttle 158.173.21.63.

🤖 User-Agent Anomaly Defense

IP 158.173.21.63 shows suspicious UA behavior. Block empty User-Agent requests. Implement JavaScript-based bot detection for sensitive endpoints.

07

Neighbors in 158.173.21.0/24

Other blocked IPs from the same /24 subnet — indicates systematic abuse from this network range.

08

Open Ports & Services

Network reconnaissance data from Shodan. Open ports may indicate running services, misconfigurations, or potential attack surfaces.

OPEN PORTS (4)
PortServiceRiskDescription
80HTTPLowHTTP web server — standard web traffic
502UnknownLowService on port 502
1337UnknownLowService on port 1337
8443HTTPS-AltLowService on port 8443

Data source: Shodan InternetDB. Scanned independently of abuse.mom.

09

Blacklist Status (DNSBL)

This IP was checked against major DNS-based blacklists used by mail servers and firewalls worldwide.

✓ Clean
ix.dnsbl.manitu.net
✓ Clean
dnsbl.sorbs.net
✓ Clean
zen.spamhaus.org
✓ Clean
bl.spamcop.net
✓ Clean
psbl.surriel.com
✓ Clean
truncate.gbudb.net
✓ Clean
b.barracudacentral.org
✓ Clean
dnsbl-1.uceprotect.net

Checked: Spamhaus, SpamCop, Barracuda, SORBS, CBL, UCEProtect. Results may change over time.

10

Threat Analysis

158.173.21.63 has been assigned a threat score of 165/100 (Critical). A score this high marks a critical threat actor. This address has demonstrated persistent, aggressive malicious behavior across multiple detection vectors.

The following attack categories were identified:

Path EnumerationRequest FloodingUser-Agent Anomaly

📊 Threat Analysis

The address 158.173.21.63 originates from Amsterdam, Netherlands, operating on the network of Datacamp Limited. It was identified through automated analysis of incoming network traffic across monitored endpoints. Our sensors captured 5 malicious requests from this address across a 1-day span, reflecting a sustained attack cadence of ~5 requests per day. The address operates as a VPN/proxy exit node. Attackers route traffic through anonymizing services to obscure their real location and evade IP-based security controls. The diversity of 3 separate attack methods suggests a comprehensive attack toolkit — likely an automated scanner that tests for vulnerabilities across multiple categories. With 118 flagged addresses, Netherlands represents a significant presence in our threat database. With a threat score of 165/100, this IP is among the most dangerous addresses in our database. Immediate and complete blocking is strongly recommended.

This IP is associated with a VPN or proxy service. Attackers frequently route their traffic through anonymizing services to obscure their true location. This makes attribution more challenging but the malicious behavior patterns remain detectable.

11

Related Threats

🇳🇱 Top threats from Netherlands

185.184.192.251 (338)45.88.138.44 (320)45.82.64.236 (315)5.181.169.192 (313)157.22.73.141 (313)View all →

🏢 Same network: AS212238

212.30.33.72 (305)98.159.233.109 (305)45.91.23.64 (305)84.233.212.3 (295)98.159.233.211 (280)View all →
12

Security Intelligence

💡 File Upload Vulnerabilities

Insecure file upload functionality allows attackers to upload web shells, malware, or scripts that execute on the server. Proper validation must check file content, not just extensions, and uploaded files should be stored outside the web root.

💡 HTTP Request Smuggling

Request smuggling exploits differences in how front-end and back-end servers parse HTTP requests. This technique can bypass security controls, poison web caches, and hijack other users sessions by desynchronizing request boundaries.

🔍 Check Any IP Address

Share this report: