ABUSE.MOM
THREAT REPORT

IP Threat Report
158.158.121.155

ABUSE.MOM — BEHAVE OR GET EXPOSED

Generated: 2026-08-28 02:56:42
First seen: 2026-08-14 15:07:28
Last seen: 2026-08-23 02:06:46
280

⛔ Verdict: BLOCK

This IP address has been classified as a source of malicious automated activity. Threat score: 280/100. Total malicious requests observed: 3953.

BURSTDANGER_PATHRATIO_404REDIRECT_PROBEUA_SUS
01

Geolocation & Classification

IP Address
158.158.121.155
Type
Residential
Country
🇪🇸 Spain
City
Madrid
ISP
Microsoft Corporation
Organization
Microsoft Azure Cloud (spaincentral)
Autonomous System
AS8075 Microsoft Corporation
Hit Count
3953
02

Detection Signatures

SignatureDescriptionPointsSeverity
404 ratio 40-60%Majority of requests returned 404 — enumeration+15
404 ratio >= 60%Majority of requests returned 404 — enumeration+25
Burst 103/10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 104/10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 105/10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 112/10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 116/10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 118/10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 122/10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 123/10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 125/10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 126/10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 127/10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 131/10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 134/10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 135/10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 137/10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 139/10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 140/10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 145/10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 146/10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 147/10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 148/10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 150/10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 151/10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 152/10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 153/10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 154/10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 157/10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 158/10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 162/10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 164/10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 165/10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 167/10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 169/10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 30/2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 32/2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 33/2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 34/2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 35/2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 36/2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 37/2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 38/2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 39/2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 40/2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 41/2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 42/2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 43/2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 44/2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 45/2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 46/2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 47/2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 85/10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 92/10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Danger medium hits: 1Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+10
Danger medium hits: 167Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Danger medium hits: 263Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Danger medium hits: 265Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Danger medium hits: 266Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Danger medium hits: 320Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Danger medium hits: 334Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Danger medium hits: 399Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Danger medium hits: 501Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Danger medium hits: 503Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Danger medium hits: 600Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Danger medium hits: 666Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Danger medium hits: 983Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Danger strong hits: 1High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+25
Danger strong hits: 12High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
Danger strong hits: 140High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
Danger strong hits: 16High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
Danger strong hits: 18High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
Danger strong hits: 205High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
Danger strong hits: 4High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
Danger strong hits: 6High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
Danger strong hits: 8High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
Probe 302→404Behavioral anomaly detected by automated analysis+20
UA suspiciousBehavioral anomaly detected by automated analysis+15
Σ = 3450
03

Observed Activity

Reconstructed HTTP requests from server access logs. Target domains redacted for security.

[redacted]
GET
/
200
[redacted]
GET
/page
200
Requests shown: 2 · HTTP 404: 0 · Dangerous patterns: 0

* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.

04

Timeline

2026-08-14 15:07:28
First malicious request detected
IP entered monitoring from server access logs
During observation
Multiple detection signatures triggered
404 ratio 40-60% (+15), 404 ratio >= 60% (+25), Burst 103/10s (+35)
2026-08-23 02:06:46
Last malicious request observed
Total score reached: 280/100
Next cycle
IP blocked — all subsequent requests denied (HTTP 403)
Added to blocklist automatically
05

Network Provider

Microsoft Corporation
AS8075 · 🇪🇸 Spain
06

Recommendations

Actions taken & recommended

  • IP 158.158.121.155 is blocked at application level (HTTP 403)
  • Consider blocking at firewall level (iptables/CSF) to reduce server load
  • Other malicious IPs detected in the same /24 subnet — consider blocking 158.158.121.0/24
  • Report abuse to the network provider via their abuse contact
  • Ensure sensitive files (.env, .git, backups) are not accessible from the web

🔎 Path Enumeration Protection

Block scanning from 158.158.121.155: rate-limit 404 responses per IP, deploy a honeypot 404 page, ensure no backup files are web-accessible.

🌊 Flood / DDoS Mitigation

Implement limit_req_zone in nginx. Deploy CDN with DDoS protection. Configure SYN cookies and connection tracking to throttle 158.158.121.155.

🤖 User-Agent Anomaly Defense

IP 158.158.121.155 shows suspicious UA behavior. Block empty User-Agent requests. Implement JavaScript-based bot detection for sensitive endpoints.

07

Neighbors in 158.158.121.0/24

Other blocked IPs from the same /24 subnet — indicates systematic abuse from this network range.

09

Blacklist Status (DNSBL)

This IP was checked against major DNS-based blacklists used by mail servers and firewalls worldwide.

✓ Clean
zen.spamhaus.org
✓ Clean
psbl.surriel.com
✓ Clean
dnsbl.dronebl.org
✓ Clean
spam.dnsbl.sorbs.net
✓ Clean
cbl.abuseat.org
✓ Clean
bl.blocklist.de
✓ Clean
b.barracudacentral.org

Checked: Spamhaus, SpamCop, Barracuda, SORBS, CBL, UCEProtect. Results may change over time.

10

Threat Analysis

158.158.121.155 has been assigned a threat score of 280/100 (Critical). A score this high marks a critical threat actor. This address has demonstrated persistent, aggressive malicious behavior across multiple detection vectors.

The following attack categories were identified:

Path EnumerationRequest FloodingUser-Agent Anomaly

📊 Threat Analysis

Network traffic from 158.158.121.155, located in Madrid, Spain, operating on the network of Microsoft Corporation, has been classified as malicious by our automated threat scoring engine. The address has been active for 8 days in our monitoring system, producing 3,953 flagged requests at a rate of ~494.1/day. This is a residential IP address, suggesting a compromised home device such as a router, smart appliance, or infected workstation participating in a botnet. The diversity of 3 separate attack methods suggests a comprehensive attack toolkit — likely an automated scanner that tests for vulnerabilities across multiple categories. Our records show 102 malicious IPs originating from Spain, positioning it as a significant contributor to global threat activity. At 280/100, this is an extremely high-risk address. All traffic should be considered hostile.

This IP is classified as residential, suggesting it may belong to a compromised home device, IoT botnet member, or an infected personal computer. Residential IPs involved in attacks often indicate malware infection without the owner's knowledge.

11

Related Threats

🇪🇸 Top threats from Spain

45.67.99.32 (305)158.173.36.160 (305)212.30.33.72 (305)34.175.3.135 (298)34.175.136.81 (295)View all →

🏢 Same network: AS8075

View all →
12

Security Intelligence

💡 DDoS Mitigation Approaches

Distributed denial of service attacks overwhelm infrastructure with traffic volume. Effective mitigation combines always-on traffic scrubbing, anycast network distribution, rate limiting, and the ability to quickly scale absorption capacity during attacks.

💡 Multi-Factor Authentication Importance

MFA dramatically reduces the effectiveness of credential-based attacks. Even when passwords are compromised through phishing or data breaches, the additional authentication factor prevents unauthorized access in the vast majority of cases.

🔍 Check Any IP Address

Share this report: