ABUSE.MOM
THREAT REPORT

IP Threat Report
152.89.129.222

ABUSE.MOM — BEHAVE OR GET EXPOSED

Generated: 2026-05-26 22:56:03
First seen: 2026-05-04 12:00:05
Last seen: 2026-05-04 12:00:05
85

⛔ Verdict: BLOCK

This IP address has been classified as a source of malicious automated activity. Threat score: 85/100. Total malicious requests observed: 1.

DANGER_PATHRATIO_404REDIRECT_PROBEREFERER
01

Geolocation & Classification

IP Address
152.89.129.222
Type
Residential
Country
🇬🇧 United Kingdom
City
London
ISP
XT GLOBAL NETWORKS LTD.
Organization
EliteWork LLC
Autonomous System
AS48095 XT GLOBAL NETWORKS LTD.
Hit Count
1
02

Detection Signatures

SignatureDescriptionPointsSeverity
Danger medium hits: 4Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+40
404 ratio 40-60%Majority of requests returned 404 — enumeration+15
Probe pattern 302->404 same pathBehavioral anomaly detected by automated analysis+20
Foreign referer seenReferer from unrelated external domain+10
Σ = 85
03

Observed Activity

Reconstructed HTTP requests from server access logs. Target domains redacted for security.

[redacted]
GET
/
200
Requests shown: 1 · HTTP 404: 0 · Dangerous patterns: 0

* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.

04

Timeline

2026-05-04 12:00:05
First malicious request detected
IP entered monitoring from server access logs
During observation
Multiple detection signatures triggered
Danger medium hits: 4 (+40), 404 ratio 40-60% (+15), Probe pattern 302->404 same path (+20)
2026-05-04 12:00:05
Last malicious request observed
Total score reached: 85/100
Next cycle
IP blocked — all subsequent requests denied (HTTP 403)
Added to blocklist automatically
05

Network Provider

XT GLOBAL NETWORKS LTD.
AS48095 · 🇬🇧 United Kingdom
06

Recommendations

Actions taken & recommended

  • IP 152.89.129.222 is blocked at application level (HTTP 403)
  • Consider blocking at firewall level (iptables/CSF) to reduce server load
  • Other malicious IPs detected in the same /24 subnet — consider blocking 152.89.129.0/24
  • Report abuse to the network provider via their abuse contact
  • Ensure sensitive files (.env, .git, backups) are not accessible from the web

🔎 Path Enumeration Protection

Block scanning from 152.89.129.222: rate-limit 404 responses per IP, deploy a honeypot 404 page, ensure no backup files are web-accessible.

07

Neighbors in 152.89.129.0/24

Other blocked IPs from the same /24 subnet — indicates systematic abuse from this network range.

08

Open Ports & Services

Network reconnaissance data from Shodan. Open ports may indicate running services, misconfigurations, or potential attack surfaces.

OPEN PORTS (5)
PortServiceRiskDescription
80HTTPLowHTTP web server — standard web traffic
3128UnknownLowService on port 3128
8000UnknownLowService on port 8000
8080HTTP-AltLowHTTP alternative port — often used for admin panels or proxies
8800UnknownLowService on port 8800
KNOWN VULNERABILITIES (CVE) (59)
CVE IDLink
CVE-2016-4553NVD →
CVE-2016-4554NVD →
CVE-2016-2390NVD →
CVE-2025-62168NVD →
CVE-2020-8517NVD →
CVE-2020-14058NVD →
CVE-2021-31807NVD →
CVE-2019-18679NVD →
CVE-2019-12523NVD →
CVE-2021-28651NVD →
CVE-2019-12524NVD →
CVE-2015-5400NVD →
CVE-2019-18860NVD →
CVE-2020-15810NVD →
CVE-2019-12521NVD →
CVE-2019-18678NVD →
CVE-2016-3947NVD →
CVE-2020-8450NVD →
CVE-2022-41318NVD →
CVE-2023-5824NVD →
CVE-2020-24606NVD →
CVE-2019-12522NVD →
CVE-2019-18677NVD →
CVE-2019-12519NVD →
CVE-2026-32748NVD →
+34 more

🔴 This host has 59 known CVEs associated with its exposed services. This volume strongly suggests severely outdated software. Review each CVE in the NVD database.

DETECTED TECHNOLOGIES
squid-cache:squid:3.1.23

Data source: Shodan InternetDB. Scanned independently of abuse.mom.

09

Blacklist Status (DNSBL)

This IP was checked against major DNS-based blacklists used by mail servers and firewalls worldwide.

✓ Clean
ix.dnsbl.manitu.net
✓ Clean
dnsbl.sorbs.net
✓ Clean
zen.spamhaus.org
✓ Clean
bl.spamcop.net
✓ Clean
b.barracudacentral.org
✓ Clean
psbl.surriel.com
✓ Clean
truncate.gbudb.net
✓ Clean
dnsbl-1.uceprotect.net

Checked: Spamhaus, SpamCop, Barracuda, SORBS, CBL, UCEProtect. Results may change over time.

10

Threat Analysis

152.89.129.222 has been assigned a threat score of 85/100 (Critical). With this rating, the IP falls into the critical severity bracket — among the most dangerous addresses in our monitoring database.

The following attack categories were identified:

Path Enumeration

📊 Threat Analysis

Network traffic from 152.89.129.222, located in London, United Kingdom, operating on the network of XT GLOBAL NETWORKS LTD., has been classified as malicious by our automated threat scoring engine. The address has been active for 1 days in our monitoring system, producing 1 flagged requests at a rate of ~1/day. Operating from a residential network, this IP may represent a compromised home gateway or IoT device that has been drafted into a larger attack infrastructure. The IP exhibits directory enumeration behavior, systematically requesting non-existent paths to discover hidden files and misconfigured resources. United Kingdom currently accounts for 30 blocked IPs in our database, making it a notable source of malicious traffic. A threat score of 85/100 places this IP in the high-risk category. Blocking at the firewall level is recommended.

This IP is classified as residential, suggesting it may belong to a compromised home device, IoT botnet member, or an infected personal computer. Residential IPs involved in attacks often indicate malware infection without the owner's knowledge.

11

Related Threats

🇬🇧 Top threats from United Kingdom

152.89.129.190 (105)152.89.128.239 (105)171.22.37.210 (105)152.89.129.60 (105)152.89.129.28 (105)View all →

🏢 Same network: AS48095

194.26.176.22 (180)46.175.152.162 (140)194.4.171.123 (140)194.4.169.86 (140)152.89.129.190 (105)View all →
12

Security Intelligence

💡 Prototype Pollution Attacks

Prototype pollution manipulates JavaScript object prototypes to inject properties that affect all objects in an application. This can lead to denial of service, property injection, and in some cases remote code execution in Node.js applications.

💡 CAPTCHA and Bot Detection

CAPTCHAs remain a primary bot defense but face increasing bypass rates from AI-powered solvers. Modern alternatives include invisible behavioral analysis, proof-of-work challenges, and device fingerprinting that detect bots without impacting user experience.

🔍 Check Any IP Address

Share this report: