ABUSE.MOM
THREAT REPORT

IP Threat Report
152.89.128.148

ABUSE.MOM — BEHAVE OR GET EXPOSED

Generated: 2026-05-26 22:56:03
First seen: 2026-04-28 06:00:04
Last seen: 2026-04-28 06:00:04
105

⛔ Verdict: BLOCK

This IP address has been classified as a source of malicious automated activity. Threat score: 105/100. Total malicious requests observed: 1.

DANGER_PATHRATIO_404REDIRECT_PROBEREFERER
01

Geolocation & Classification

IP Address
152.89.128.148
Type
Residential
Country
🇬🇧 United Kingdom
City
London
ISP
XT GLOBAL NETWORKS LTD.
Organization
EliteWork LLC
Autonomous System
AS48095 XT GLOBAL NETWORKS LTD.
Hit Count
1
02

Detection Signatures

SignatureDescriptionPointsSeverity
Danger medium hits: 6Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
404 ratio 40-60%Majority of requests returned 404 — enumeration+15
Probe pattern 302->404 same pathBehavioral anomaly detected by automated analysis+20
Foreign referer seenReferer from unrelated external domain+10
Σ = 105
03

Observed Activity

Reconstructed HTTP requests from server access logs. Target domains redacted for security.

[redacted]
GET
/
200
Requests shown: 1 · HTTP 404: 0 · Dangerous patterns: 0

* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.

04

Timeline

2026-04-28 06:00:04
First malicious request detected
IP entered monitoring from server access logs
During observation
Multiple detection signatures triggered
Danger medium hits: 6 (+60), 404 ratio 40-60% (+15), Probe pattern 302->404 same path (+20)
2026-04-28 06:00:04
Last malicious request observed
Total score reached: 105/100
Next cycle
IP blocked — all subsequent requests denied (HTTP 403)
Added to blocklist automatically
05

Network Provider

XT GLOBAL NETWORKS LTD.
AS48095 · 🇬🇧 United Kingdom
06

Recommendations

Actions taken & recommended

  • IP 152.89.128.148 is blocked at application level (HTTP 403)
  • Consider blocking at firewall level (iptables/CSF) to reduce server load
  • Other malicious IPs detected in the same /24 subnet — consider blocking 152.89.128.0/24
  • Report abuse to the network provider via their abuse contact
  • Ensure sensitive files (.env, .git, backups) are not accessible from the web

🔎 Path Enumeration Protection

Block scanning from 152.89.128.148: rate-limit 404 responses per IP, deploy a honeypot 404 page, ensure no backup files are web-accessible.

07

Neighbors in 152.89.128.0/24

Other blocked IPs from the same /24 subnet — indicates systematic abuse from this network range.

08

Open Ports & Services

Network reconnaissance data from Shodan. Open ports may indicate running services, misconfigurations, or potential attack surfaces.

OPEN PORTS (5)
PortServiceRiskDescription
80HTTPLowHTTP web server — standard web traffic
8000UnknownLowService on port 8000
8080HTTP-AltLowHTTP alternative port — often used for admin panels or proxies
8800UnknownLowService on port 8800
52951UnknownLowService on port 52951
KNOWN VULNERABILITIES (CVE) (59)
CVE IDLink
CVE-2019-12521NVD →
CVE-2020-11945NVD →
CVE-2021-28652NVD →
CVE-2019-18676NVD →
CVE-2025-62168NVD →
CVE-2021-31807NVD →
CVE-2019-18860NVD →
CVE-2024-25617NVD →
CVE-2019-18678NVD →
CVE-2019-12520NVD →
CVE-2024-45802NVD →
CVE-2021-31806NVD →
CVE-2019-12526NVD →
CVE-2021-46784NVD →
CVE-2019-12528NVD →
CVE-2021-33620NVD →
CVE-2023-46846NVD →
CVE-2023-50269NVD →
CVE-2016-3947NVD →
CVE-2026-33515NVD →
CVE-2019-18679NVD →
CVE-2023-46728NVD →
CVE-2023-49286NVD →
CVE-2016-4554NVD →
CVE-2016-2390NVD →
+34 more

🔴 Security scanning identified 59 vulnerability entries on this host. This volume strongly suggests severely outdated software. Consult NVD advisories for details.

DETECTED TECHNOLOGIES
squid-cache:squid:3.1.23

Data source: Shodan InternetDB. Scanned independently of abuse.mom.

09

Blacklist Status (DNSBL)

This IP was checked against major DNS-based blacklists used by mail servers and firewalls worldwide.

✓ Clean
dnsbl.sorbs.net
✓ Clean
ix.dnsbl.manitu.net
✓ Clean
zen.spamhaus.org
✓ Clean
bl.spamcop.net
✓ Clean
b.barracudacentral.org
✓ Clean
psbl.surriel.com
✓ Clean
truncate.gbudb.net
✓ Clean
dnsbl-1.uceprotect.net

Checked: Spamhaus, SpamCop, Barracuda, SORBS, CBL, UCEProtect. Results may change over time.

10

Threat Analysis

152.89.128.148 has been assigned a threat score of 105/100 (Critical). This places it in the critical threat category. Immediate blocking is strongly advised across all network perimeters.

The following attack categories were identified:

Path Enumeration

📊 Threat Analysis

Our monitoring infrastructure has identified 152.89.128.148, geolocated to London, United Kingdom, operating on the network of XT GLOBAL NETWORKS LTD., as a source of suspicious network activity. The address has been active for 1 days in our monitoring system, producing 1 flagged requests at a rate of ~1/day. Operating from a residential network, this IP may represent a compromised home gateway or IoT device that has been drafted into a larger attack infrastructure. The IP exhibits directory enumeration behavior, systematically requesting non-existent paths to discover hidden files and misconfigured resources. United Kingdom currently accounts for 30 blocked IPs in our database, making it a notable source of malicious traffic. With a threat score of 105/100, this IP is among the most dangerous addresses in our database. Immediate and complete blocking is strongly recommended.

This IP is classified as residential, suggesting it may belong to a compromised home device, IoT botnet member, or an infected personal computer. Residential IPs involved in attacks often indicate malware infection without the owner's knowledge.

11

Related Threats

🇬🇧 Top threats from United Kingdom

152.89.129.190 (105)152.89.128.239 (105)171.22.37.210 (105)152.89.129.60 (105)152.89.129.28 (105)View all →

🏢 Same network: AS48095

194.26.176.22 (180)46.175.152.162 (140)194.4.171.123 (140)194.4.169.86 (140)152.89.129.190 (105)View all →
12

Security Intelligence

💡 Directory Traversal Attacks

Path traversal attacks attempt to access files outside the intended directory by manipulating file path references. Attackers use sequences like ../ to reach sensitive system files such as /etc/passwd or application configuration files.

💡 Behavioral Analysis vs Signature Detection

Signature-based detection matches known attack patterns but misses novel threats. Behavioral analysis identifies anomalies in request patterns, timing, and volume, catching zero-day attacks that signatures cannot recognize.

🔍 Check Any IP Address

Share this report: