ABUSE.MOM
THREAT REPORT

IP Threat Report
152.232.53.103

ABUSE.MOM — BEHAVE OR GET EXPOSED

Generated: 2026-05-21 21:03:24
First seen: 2026-05-11 14:00:06
Last seen: 2026-05-11 14:00:06
105

⛔ Verdict: BLOCK

This IP address has been classified as a source of malicious automated activity. Threat score: 105/100. Total malicious requests observed: 1.

DANGER_PATHRATIO_404REDIRECT_PROBEREFERER
01

Geolocation & Classification

IP Address
152.232.53.103
Type
Residential
Country
🇺🇸 United States
City
Los Angeles
ISP
HostPapa
Organization
B2 Net Solutions Inc
Autonomous System
AS36352 HostPapa
Hit Count
1
02

Detection Signatures

SignatureDescriptionPointsSeverity
Danger medium hits: 6Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
404 ratio 40-60%Majority of requests returned 404 — enumeration+15
Probe pattern 302->404 same pathBehavioral anomaly detected by automated analysis+20
Foreign referer seenReferer from unrelated external domain+10
Σ = 105
03

Observed Activity

Reconstructed HTTP requests from server access logs. Target domains redacted for security.

[redacted]
GET
/
200
Requests shown: 1 · HTTP 404: 0 · Dangerous patterns: 0

* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.

04

Timeline

2026-05-11 14:00:06
First malicious request detected
IP entered monitoring from server access logs
During observation
Multiple detection signatures triggered
Danger medium hits: 6 (+60), 404 ratio 40-60% (+15), Probe pattern 302->404 same path (+20)
2026-05-11 14:00:06
Last malicious request observed
Total score reached: 105/100
Next cycle
IP blocked — all subsequent requests denied (HTTP 403)
Added to blocklist automatically
05

Network Provider

HostPapa
AS36352 · 🇺🇸 United States
06

Recommendations

Actions taken & recommended

  • IP 152.232.53.103 is blocked at application level (HTTP 403)
  • Consider blocking at firewall level (iptables/CSF) to reduce server load
  • Other malicious IPs detected in the same /24 subnet — consider blocking 152.232.53.0/24
  • Report abuse to the network provider via their abuse contact
  • Ensure sensitive files (.env, .git, backups) are not accessible from the web

🔎 Directory Scan Defense

IP 152.232.53.103 is enumerating directories. Configure fail2ban apache-404 jail after 10+ 404 errors. Disable directory listings. Normalize all 404 responses.

07

Neighbors in 152.232.53.0/24

Other blocked IPs from the same /24 subnet — indicates systematic abuse from this network range.

08

Open Ports & Services

Network reconnaissance data from Shodan. Open ports may indicate running services, misconfigurations, or potential attack surfaces.

OPEN PORTS (5)
PortServiceRiskDescription
80HTTPLowHTTP web server — standard web traffic
3128UnknownLowService on port 3128
8000UnknownLowService on port 8000
8800UnknownLowService on port 8800
21242UnknownLowService on port 21242
KNOWN VULNERABILITIES (CVE) (59)
CVE IDLink
CVE-2020-24606NVD →
CVE-2020-15811NVD →
CVE-2023-49285NVD →
CVE-2019-12528NVD →
CVE-2019-12522NVD →
CVE-2016-10003NVD →
CVE-2019-18677NVD →
CVE-2020-8450NVD →
CVE-2026-33515NVD →
CVE-2019-18676NVD →
CVE-2018-1000024NVD →
CVE-2023-46847NVD →
CVE-2019-12520NVD →
CVE-2019-12524NVD →
CVE-2021-46784NVD →
CVE-2020-8517NVD →
CVE-2018-19131NVD →
CVE-2021-31806NVD →
CVE-2023-49286NVD →
CVE-2025-62168NVD →
CVE-2024-45802NVD →
CVE-2023-46846NVD →
CVE-2024-37894NVD →
CVE-2019-18678NVD →
CVE-2020-25097NVD →
+34 more

🔴 This host has 59 known CVEs associated with its exposed services. This volume strongly suggests severely outdated software. Review each CVE in the NVD database.

DETECTED TECHNOLOGIES
squid-cache:squid:3.5.20

Data source: Shodan InternetDB. Scanned independently of abuse.mom.

09

Blacklist Status (DNSBL)

This IP was checked against major DNS-based blacklists used by mail servers and firewalls worldwide.

✓ Clean
ix.dnsbl.manitu.net
✓ Clean
dnsbl.sorbs.net
✓ Clean
zen.spamhaus.org
✓ Clean
dnsbl-1.uceprotect.net
✓ Clean
bl.spamcop.net
✓ Clean
psbl.surriel.com
✓ Clean
b.barracudacentral.org
✓ Clean
truncate.gbudb.net

Checked: Spamhaus, SpamCop, Barracuda, SORBS, CBL, UCEProtect. Results may change over time.

10

Threat Analysis

152.232.53.103 has been assigned a threat score of 105/100 (Critical). This places it in the critical threat category. Immediate blocking is strongly advised across all network perimeters.

The following attack categories were identified:

Path Enumeration

📊 Threat Analysis

152.232.53.103 is registered in Los Angeles, United States, operating on the network of HostPapa. This IP first appeared in our threat feeds after triggering multiple behavioral detection signatures. Over a period of 1 days, this IP generated 1 malicious requests, averaging approximately 1 requests per day. The address is classified as residential, meaning it likely belongs to an end-user ISP connection. Malicious activity from residential IPs typically indicates device compromise or botnet membership. Active path scanning has been detected — this IP probes for hundreds of common file and directory names. Our records show 205 malicious IPs originating from United States, positioning it as a significant contributor to global threat activity. At 105/100, this is an extremely high-risk address. All traffic should be considered hostile.

This IP is classified as residential, suggesting it may belong to a compromised home device, IoT botnet member, or an infected personal computer. Residential IPs involved in attacks often indicate malware infection without the owner's knowledge.

11

Related Threats

🇺🇸 Top threats from United States

104.28.246.115 (350)104.28.246.113 (340)104.28.246.116 (340)104.28.235.58 (340)104.28.246.122 (340)View all →

🏢 Same network: AS36352

23.94.40.119 (318)172.245.95.40 (280)23.94.28.183 (255)192.227.215.35 (255)172.245.214.62 (245)View all →
12

Security Intelligence

💡 Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)

SSRF attacks trick servers into making requests to internal resources that should not be publicly accessible. This can expose cloud metadata endpoints, internal APIs, and private network services, potentially leading to full infrastructure compromise.

💡 TLS Certificate Misconfigurations

Expired, self-signed, or misconfigured TLS certificates create security vulnerabilities and trust issues. Certificate monitoring, automated renewal through ACME protocols, and proper certificate chain configuration prevent both security gaps and service disruptions.

🔍 Check Any IP Address

Share this report: