ABUSE.MOM
THREAT REPORT

IP Threat Report
149.56.160.132

ABUSE.MOM — BEHAVE OR GET EXPOSED

Generated: 2026-05-30 09:13:33
First seen: 2026-02-28 20:00:04
Last seen: 2026-02-28 20:00:04
105

⛔ Verdict: BLOCK

This IP address has been classified as a source of malicious automated activity. Threat score: 105/100. Total malicious requests observed: 1.

UA_CHANGEDBURSTREFERER
01

Geolocation & Classification

IP Address
149.56.160.132
Type
Hosting
Country
🇨🇦 Canada
City
Montreal
ISP
OVH SAS
Organization
Dataprovider B.V.
Autonomous System
AS16276 OVH SAS
Hit Count
1
02

Detection Signatures

SignatureDescriptionPointsSeverity
UA changed for same IPMultiple User-Agents — bot rotation technique+25
Burst: 11 req / 2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst: 18 req / 10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Foreign referer seenReferer from unrelated external domain+10
Σ = 105
03

Observed Activity

Reconstructed HTTP requests from server access logs. Target domains redacted for security.

[redacted]
GET
/
200
[redacted]
GET
/page
200
Requests shown: 2 · HTTP 404: 0 · Dangerous patterns: 0

* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.

04

Timeline

2026-02-28 20:00:04
First malicious request detected
IP entered monitoring from server access logs
During observation
Multiple detection signatures triggered
UA changed for same IP (+25), Burst: 11 req / 2s (+35), Burst: 18 req / 10s (+35)
2026-02-28 20:00:04
Last malicious request observed
Total score reached: 105/100
Next cycle
IP blocked — all subsequent requests denied (HTTP 403)
Added to blocklist automatically
05

Network Provider

OVH SAS
AS16276 · 🇨🇦 Canada
06

Recommendations

Actions taken & recommended

  • IP 149.56.160.132 is blocked at application level (HTTP 403)
  • Consider blocking at firewall level (iptables/CSF) to reduce server load
  • Other malicious IPs detected in the same /24 subnet — consider blocking 149.56.160.0/24
  • Report abuse to the network provider via their abuse contact
  • Ensure sensitive files (.env, .git, backups) are not accessible from the web

🤖 Bot Detection

Address UA spoofing from 149.56.160.132: maintain blocklist of known malicious UA strings, require consistent UA across sessions, implement TLS fingerprinting.

🌊 Flood / DDoS Mitigation

Implement limit_req_zone in nginx. Deploy CDN with DDoS protection. Configure SYN cookies and connection tracking to throttle 149.56.160.132.

07

Neighbors in 149.56.160.0/24

Other blocked IPs from the same /24 subnet — indicates systematic abuse from this network range.

09

Blacklist Status (DNSBL)

This IP was checked against major DNS-based blacklists used by mail servers and firewalls worldwide.

⛔ LISTED
Spamhaus ZEN

Checked: Spamhaus, SpamCop, Barracuda, SORBS, CBL, UCEProtect. Results may change over time.

10

Threat Analysis

149.56.160.132 has been assigned a threat score of 105/100 (Critical). This represents a critical risk level. Our detection systems have flagged multiple high-confidence indicators of malicious intent from this address.

The following attack categories were identified:

User-Agent AnomalyRequest Flooding

📊 Threat Analysis

Network traffic from 149.56.160.132, located in Montreal, Canada, operating on the network of OVH SAS, has been classified as malicious by our automated threat scoring engine. Over a period of 1 days, this IP generated 1 malicious requests, averaging approximately 1 requests per day. This address belongs to a datacenter or cloud hosting provider. Hosting IPs are frequently leveraged by threat actors who rent cheap VPS instances specifically for conducting attacks. The dual attack vectors of User-Agent Anomaly combined with Request Flooding indicate a coordinated assault rather than opportunistic scanning. With 188 flagged addresses, Canada represents a significant presence in our threat database. With a threat score of 105/100, this IP is among the most dangerous addresses in our database. Immediate and complete blocking is strongly recommended.

This IP belongs to a hosting or data center provider. Malicious traffic from hosting infrastructure often originates from compromised VPS instances, rented servers used for scanning campaigns, or abused free-tier cloud accounts. Hosting providers typically respond to abuse reports within 24-72 hours.

11

Related Threats

🇨🇦 Top threats from Canada

20.151.111.128 (308)45.91.23.64 (305)147.15.149.40 (300)148.116.72.171 (300)89.251.0.24 (295)View all →

🏢 Same network: AS16276

51.38.99.224 (280)151.243.236.245 (275)54.37.156.148 (273)146.59.235.113 (263)51.83.98.78 (255)View all →
12

Security Intelligence

💡 User-Agent Analysis Techniques

Analyzing User-Agent strings reveals automated tools masquerading as legitimate browsers. Inconsistencies between claimed browser capabilities and actual behavior, impossible version combinations, and known scanner signatures help identify malicious clients.

💡 Content Security Policy Implementation

Content Security Policy headers instruct browsers to restrict resource loading, mitigating XSS and data injection attacks. Properly configured CSP policies prevent inline script execution, restrict iframe embedding, and control which domains can serve content.

🔍 Check Any IP Address

Share this report: