ABUSE.MOM
THREAT REPORT

IP Threat Report
144.31.7.136

ABUSE.MOM — BEHAVE OR GET EXPOSED

Generated: 2026-05-27 04:53:51
First seen: 2026-05-24 21:40:31
Last seen: 2026-05-27 04:40:48
80

⛔ Verdict: BLOCK

This IP address has been classified as a source of malicious automated activity. Threat score: 80/100. Total malicious requests observed: 97.

BURSTREFERER
01

Geolocation & Classification

IP Address
144.31.7.136
Type
Residential
Country
🇫🇮 Finland
City
Helsinki
ISP
H2nexus LTD
Organization
H2nexus LTD
Autonomous System
AS215730 H2NEXUS LTD
Hit Count
97
02

Detection Signatures

SignatureDescriptionPointsSeverity
Burst 10/10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 10/2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Foreign refererReferer from unrelated external domain+10
Σ = 80
03

Observed Activity

Reconstructed HTTP requests from server access logs. Target domains redacted for security.

[redacted]
GET
/
200
[redacted]
GET
/page
200
Requests shown: 2 · HTTP 404: 0 · Dangerous patterns: 0

* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.

04

Timeline

2026-05-24 21:40:31
First malicious request detected
IP entered monitoring from server access logs
During observation
Multiple detection signatures triggered
Burst 10/10s (+35), Burst 10/2s (+35), Foreign referer (+10)
2026-05-27 04:40:48
Last malicious request observed
Total score reached: 80/100
Next cycle
IP blocked — all subsequent requests denied (HTTP 403)
Added to blocklist automatically
05

Network Provider

H2nexus LTD
AS215730 · 🇫🇮 Finland
06

Recommendations

Actions taken & recommended

  • IP 144.31.7.136 is blocked at application level (HTTP 403)
  • Consider blocking at firewall level (iptables/CSF) to reduce server load
  • Report abuse to the network provider via their abuse contact
  • Ensure sensitive files (.env, .git, backups) are not accessible from the web

🌊 Traffic Flood Defense

IP 144.31.7.136 is generating excessive traffic. Limit connections per source IP. Enable geographic blocking if traffic from this region is unexpected.

09

Blacklist Status (DNSBL)

This IP was checked against major DNS-based blacklists used by mail servers and firewalls worldwide.

✓ Clean
b.barracudacentral.org
✓ Clean
dnsbl.dronebl.org

Checked: Spamhaus, SpamCop, Barracuda, SORBS, CBL, UCEProtect. Results may change over time.

10

Threat Analysis

144.31.7.136 has been assigned a threat score of 80/100 (Critical). This represents a critical risk level. Our detection systems have flagged multiple high-confidence indicators of malicious intent from this address.

The following attack categories were identified:

Request Flooding

📊 Threat Analysis

Our monitoring infrastructure has identified 144.31.7.136, geolocated to Helsinki, Finland, operating on the network of H2nexus LTD, as a source of suspicious network activity. The address has been active for 2 days in our monitoring system, producing 97 flagged requests at a rate of ~48.5/day. The address is classified as residential, meaning it likely belongs to an end-user ISP connection. Malicious activity from residential IPs typically indicates device compromise or botnet membership. The IP is engaged in request flooding, sending traffic at rates designed to exhaust server capacity. Finland currently accounts for 101 blocked IPs in our database, making it a significant source of malicious traffic. At 80/100, this IP warrants immediate defensive action.

This IP is classified as residential, suggesting it may belong to a compromised home device, IoT botnet member, or an infected personal computer. Residential IPs involved in attacks often indicate malware infection without the owner's knowledge.

11

Related Threats

🇫🇮 Top threats from Finland

122.8.95.61 (268)45.159.21.231 (268)35.228.27.37 (263)35.228.208.169 (260)122.8.45.163 (245)View all →

🏢 Same network: AS215730

87.120.93.156 (195)144.31.90.215 (180)87.120.93.167 (180)94.159.108.12 (105)144.31.4.74 (90)View all →
12

Security Intelligence

💡 DDoS Mitigation Approaches

Distributed denial of service attacks overwhelm infrastructure with traffic volume. Effective mitigation combines always-on traffic scrubbing, anycast network distribution, rate limiting, and the ability to quickly scale absorption capacity during attacks.

💡 Responsible Disclosure Ethics

Responsible disclosure balances public safety with giving vendors time to patch vulnerabilities. The security community generally supports coordinated disclosure timelines, but disagreements about appropriate timeframes and full disclosure continue to drive policy debates.

🔍 Check Any IP Address

Share this report: