ABUSE.MOM
THREAT REPORT

IP Threat Report
136.144.42.226

ABUSE.MOM — BEHAVE OR GET EXPOSED

Generated: 2026-05-22 13:04:58
First seen: 2026-03-08 13:28:05
Last seen: 2026-03-08 13:28:05
70

⛔ Verdict: BLOCK

This IP address has been classified as a source of malicious automated activity. Threat score: 70/100. Total malicious requests observed: 1.

FORM_SPAM
01

Geolocation & Classification

IP Address
136.144.42.226
Type
VPN/Proxy
Country
🇺🇸 United States
City
Washington
ISP
F.N.S. HOLDINGS LIMITED
Organization
VPN Consumer Washington DC, United States
Autonomous System
AS206092 F.N.S. HOLDINGS LIMITED
Hit Count
1
02

Detection Signatures

SignatureDescriptionPointsSeverity
Form spam: no_js_checkSpam/malware keywords in request content+0
Σ = 0
03

Observed Activity

Reconstructed HTTP requests from server access logs. Target domains redacted for security.

[redacted]
GET
/
200
Requests shown: 1 · HTTP 404: 0 · Dangerous patterns: 0

* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.

04

Timeline

2026-03-08 13:28:05
First malicious request detected
IP entered monitoring from server access logs
During observation
Multiple detection signatures triggered
Form spam: no_js_check
2026-03-08 13:28:05
Last malicious request observed
Total score reached: 70/100
Next cycle
IP blocked — all subsequent requests denied (HTTP 403)
Added to blocklist automatically
05

Network Provider

F.N.S. HOLDINGS LIMITED
AS206092 · 🇺🇸 United States
06

Recommendations

Actions taken & recommended

  • IP 136.144.42.226 is blocked at application level (HTTP 403)
  • Consider blocking at firewall level (iptables/CSF) to reduce server load
  • Other malicious IPs detected in the same /24 subnet — consider blocking 136.144.42.0/24
  • Report abuse to the network provider via their abuse contact
  • Ensure sensitive files (.env, .git, backups) are not accessible from the web

📧 Spam Protection

Enable CAPTCHA on all public forms. Add honeypot fields. Rate-limit submissions to 3 per minute per IP. Deploy Akismet or CleanTalk.

07

Neighbors in 136.144.42.0/24

Other blocked IPs from the same /24 subnet — indicates systematic abuse from this network range.

09

Blacklist Status (DNSBL)

This IP was checked against major DNS-based blacklists used by mail servers and firewalls worldwide.

⛔ LISTED
Spamhaus ZEN

Checked: Spamhaus, SpamCop, Barracuda, SORBS, CBL, UCEProtect. Results may change over time.

10

Threat Analysis

136.144.42.226 has been assigned a threat score of 70/100 (High). This classifies it as a high-severity threat. Proactive blocking is recommended for sensitive infrastructure.

📊 Threat Analysis

Our monitoring infrastructure has identified 136.144.42.226, geolocated to Washington, United States, operating on the network of F.N.S. HOLDINGS LIMITED, as a source of suspicious network activity. The address has been active for 1 days in our monitoring system, producing 1 flagged requests at a rate of ~1/day. This IP is identified as a VPN or proxy endpoint, commonly used to mask the true origin of attack traffic and bypass geographic or reputation-based blocking. United States currently accounts for 150 blocked IPs in our database, making it a significant source of malicious traffic. At 70/100, this IP warrants immediate defensive action.

This IP is associated with a VPN or proxy service. Attackers frequently route their traffic through anonymizing services to obscure their true location. This makes attribution more challenging but the malicious behavior patterns remain detectable.

11

Related Threats

🇺🇸 Top threats from United States

104.28.246.115 (350)104.28.246.113 (340)104.28.246.116 (340)104.28.235.58 (340)104.28.246.122 (340)View all →

🏢 Same network: AS206092

103.163.220.216 (340)85.203.21.101 (320)85.203.21.157 (310)85.203.21.172 (305)91.217.249.222 (305)View all →
12

Security Intelligence

💡 SQL Injection Campaigns

SQL injection remains one of the most common web attack vectors. Attackers inject malicious SQL code through input fields to extract database contents, modify data, or gain administrative access. Automated scanners test for SQLi vulnerabilities at massive scale.

💡 Rate Limiting and Throttling Strategies

Effective rate limiting must balance protection against abuse with allowing legitimate traffic bursts. Sliding window algorithms, token buckets, and adaptive thresholds based on client reputation provide layered defense against flooding attacks.

🔍 Check Any IP Address

Share this report: