ABUSE.MOM
THREAT REPORT

IP Threat Report
135.232.20.2

ABUSE.MOM — BEHAVE OR GET EXPOSED

Generated: 2026-05-27 08:34:32
First seen: 2026-03-12 22:00:12
Last seen: 2026-05-05 20:00:05
60

⛔ Verdict: BLOCK

This IP address has been classified as a source of malicious automated activity. Threat score: 60/100. Total malicious requests observed: 2.

BURSTREFERERRATIO_404
01

Geolocation & Classification

IP Address
135.232.20.2
Type
Hosting
Country
🇺🇸 United States
City
Boydton
ISP
MICROSOFT
Organization
Microsoft Azure Cloud (eastus2)
Autonomous System
AS8075 Microsoft Corporation
Hit Count
2
02

Detection Signatures

SignatureDescriptionPointsSeverity
Burst: 7 req / 2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Foreign referer seenReferer from unrelated external domain+10
404 ratio 40-60%Majority of requests returned 404 — enumeration+15
Burst: 5 req / 2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Σ = 95
03

Observed Activity

Reconstructed HTTP requests from server access logs. Target domains redacted for security.

[redacted]
GET
/
200
[redacted]
GET
/page
200
Requests shown: 2 · HTTP 404: 0 · Dangerous patterns: 0

* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.

04

Timeline

2026-03-12 22:00:12
First malicious request detected
IP entered monitoring from server access logs
During observation
Multiple detection signatures triggered
Burst: 7 req / 2s (+35), Foreign referer seen (+10), 404 ratio 40-60% (+15)
2026-05-05 20:00:05
Last malicious request observed
Total score reached: 60/100
Next cycle
IP blocked — all subsequent requests denied (HTTP 403)
Added to blocklist automatically
05

Network Provider

MICROSOFT
AS8075 · 🇺🇸 United States
06

Recommendations

Actions taken & recommended

  • IP 135.232.20.2 is blocked at application level (HTTP 403)
  • Consider blocking at firewall level (iptables/CSF) to reduce server load
  • Report abuse to the network provider via their abuse contact
  • Ensure sensitive files (.env, .git, backups) are not accessible from the web

🌊 Traffic Flood Defense

IP 135.232.20.2 is generating excessive traffic. Limit connections per source IP. Enable geographic blocking if traffic from this region is unexpected.

🔎 Path Enumeration Protection

Block scanning from 135.232.20.2: rate-limit 404 responses per IP, deploy a honeypot 404 page, ensure no backup files are web-accessible.

09

Blacklist Status (DNSBL)

This IP was checked against major DNS-based blacklists used by mail servers and firewalls worldwide.

✓ Clean
dnsbl.sorbs.net
✓ Clean
ix.dnsbl.manitu.net
✓ Clean
zen.spamhaus.org
✓ Clean
dnsbl-1.uceprotect.net
✓ Clean
bl.spamcop.net
✓ Clean
b.barracudacentral.org
✓ Clean
truncate.gbudb.net
✓ Clean
psbl.surriel.com

Checked: Spamhaus, SpamCop, Barracuda, SORBS, CBL, UCEProtect. Results may change over time.

10

Threat Analysis

135.232.20.2 has been assigned a threat score of 60/100 (High). At this threat level, the IP is considered high risk. Firewall rules should be updated to deny traffic from this source.

The following attack categories were identified:

Request FloodingPath Enumeration

📊 Threat Analysis

IP address 135.232.20.2 has been traced to Boydton, United States, operating on the network of MICROSOFT. Our threat detection systems have flagged this address based on observed malicious behavior patterns. The address has been active for 53 days in our monitoring system, producing 2 flagged requests at a rate of ~0/day. This address belongs to a datacenter or cloud hosting provider. Hosting IPs are frequently leveraged by threat actors who rent cheap VPS instances specifically for conducting attacks. The dual attack vectors of Request Flooding combined with Path Enumeration indicate a coordinated assault rather than opportunistic scanning. With 101 flagged addresses, United States represents a significant presence in our threat database. At 60/100, this IP presents a meaningful threat. Implement rate limiting with escalation to blocking.

This IP belongs to a hosting or data center provider. Malicious traffic from hosting infrastructure often originates from compromised VPS instances, rented servers used for scanning campaigns, or abused free-tier cloud accounts. Hosting providers typically respond to abuse reports within 24-72 hours.

11

Related Threats

🇺🇸 Top threats from United States

104.28.246.115 (350)104.28.246.113 (340)104.28.246.116 (340)104.28.235.58 (340)104.28.246.122 (340)View all →

🏢 Same network: AS8075

74.241.249.229 (340)20.151.111.128 (308)4.182.24.88 (285)20.65.61.3 (283)4.205.39.97 (283)View all →
12

Security Intelligence

💡 DDoS Mitigation Approaches

Distributed denial of service attacks overwhelm infrastructure with traffic volume. Effective mitigation combines always-on traffic scrubbing, anycast network distribution, rate limiting, and the ability to quickly scale absorption capacity during attacks.

💡 Behavioral Analysis vs Signature Detection

Signature-based detection matches known attack patterns but misses novel threats. Behavioral analysis identifies anomalies in request patterns, timing, and volume, catching zero-day attacks that signatures cannot recognize.

🔍 Check Any IP Address

Share this report: