ABUSE.MOM
THREAT REPORT

IP Threat Report
135.136.65.43

ABUSE.MOM — BEHAVE OR GET EXPOSED

Generated: 2026-09-13 02:42:28
First seen: 2026-09-04 19:22:15
Last seen: 2026-09-06 01:04:52
235

⛔ Verdict: BLOCK

This IP address has been classified as a source of malicious automated activity. Threat score: 235/100. Total malicious requests observed: 36.

BOT_UABURSTDANGER_PATH
01

Geolocation & Classification

IP Address
135.136.65.43
Type
Hosting
Country
🇨🇷 CR
City
San José
ISP
M247 LTD
Organization
M247 Ltd Costa Rica
Autonomous System
AS9009 M247 Europe SRL
Hit Count
36
02

Detection Signatures

SignatureDescriptionPointsSeverity
Burst 13/10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Danger medium hits: 18Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Danger strong hits: 13High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
UA bot: Go-http-clientKnown bot/crawler User-Agent detected+40
Σ = 235
03

Observed Activity

Reconstructed HTTP requests from server access logs. Target domains redacted for security.

[redacted]
GET
/
200
[redacted]
GET
/page
200
Requests shown: 2 · HTTP 404: 0 · Dangerous patterns: 0

* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.

04

Timeline

2026-09-04 19:22:15
First malicious request detected
IP entered monitoring from server access logs
During observation
Multiple detection signatures triggered
Burst 13/10s (+35), Danger medium hits: 18 (+60), Danger strong hits: 13 (+100)
2026-09-06 01:04:52
Last malicious request observed
Total score reached: 235/100
Next cycle
IP blocked — all subsequent requests denied (HTTP 403)
Added to blocklist automatically
05

Network Provider

M247 LTD
AS9009 · 🇨🇷 CR
06

Recommendations

Actions taken & recommended

  • IP 135.136.65.43 is blocked at application level (HTTP 403)
  • Consider blocking at firewall level (iptables/CSF) to reduce server load
  • Report abuse to the network provider via their abuse contact
  • Ensure sensitive files (.env, .git, backups) are not accessible from the web

🌊 Flood / DDoS Mitigation

Implement limit_req_zone in nginx. Deploy CDN with DDoS protection. Configure SYN cookies and connection tracking to throttle 135.136.65.43.

🤖 Bot Detection

Address UA spoofing from 135.136.65.43: maintain blocklist of known malicious UA strings, require consistent UA across sessions, implement TLS fingerprinting.

09

Blacklist Status (DNSBL)

This IP was checked against major DNS-based blacklists used by mail servers and firewalls worldwide.

✓ Clean
dnsbl.dronebl.org
✓ Clean
zen.spamhaus.org
✓ Clean
cbl.abuseat.org
✓ Clean
bl.blocklist.de
✓ Clean
spam.dnsbl.sorbs.net
✓ Clean
b.barracudacentral.org
✓ Clean
psbl.surriel.com

Checked: Spamhaus, SpamCop, Barracuda, SORBS, CBL, UCEProtect. Results may change over time.

10

Threat Analysis

135.136.65.43 has been assigned a threat score of 235/100 (Critical). A score this high marks a critical threat actor. This address has demonstrated persistent, aggressive malicious behavior across multiple detection vectors.

The following attack categories were identified:

Request FloodingUser-Agent Anomaly

📊 Threat Analysis

The address 135.136.65.43 originates from San José, CR, operating on the network of M247 LTD. It was identified through automated analysis of incoming network traffic across monitored endpoints. The address has been active for 1 days in our monitoring system, producing 36 flagged requests at a rate of ~36/day. The IP is classified as hosting/datacenter infrastructure, commonly associated with rented servers used for automated attack campaigns, botnet command-and-control, or vulnerability scanning at scale. Two attack patterns were identified (Request Flooding and User-Agent Anomaly), suggesting a semi-automated campaign that targets multiple vulnerabilities. With a threat score of 235/100, this IP is among the most dangerous addresses in our database. Immediate and complete blocking is strongly recommended.

This IP belongs to a hosting or data center provider. Malicious traffic from hosting infrastructure often originates from compromised VPS instances, rented servers used for scanning campaigns, or abused free-tier cloud accounts. Hosting providers typically respond to abuse reports within 24-72 hours.

11

Related Threats

🇨🇷 Top threats from CR

View all →

🏢 Same network: AS9009

135.136.67.226 (270)135.136.47.174 (255)135.136.42.150 (255)135.136.42.24 (255)135.136.42.145 (255)View all →
12

Security Intelligence

💡 DDoS Mitigation Approaches

Distributed denial of service attacks overwhelm infrastructure with traffic volume. Effective mitigation combines always-on traffic scrubbing, anycast network distribution, rate limiting, and the ability to quickly scale absorption capacity during attacks.

💡 Mobile Network Threat Landscape

Mobile carrier NAT (CGNAT) means thousands of users share a single public IP, making mobile IPs unreliable for reputation scoring. However, mobile networks are increasingly used as attack platforms through compromised apps and malicious SDKs.

🔍 Check Any IP Address

Share this report: