ABUSE.MOM
THREAT REPORT

IP Threat Report
112.86.225.152

ABUSE.MOM — BEHAVE OR GET EXPOSED

Generated: 2026-09-14 12:55:24
First seen: 2026-08-30 16:04:34
Last seen: 2026-09-06 01:02:46
95

⛔ Verdict: BLOCK

This IP address has been classified as a source of malicious automated activity. Threat score: 95/100. Total malicious requests observed: 191.

DANGER_PATHRATIO_404REDIRECT_PROBEREFERER
01

Geolocation & Classification

IP Address
112.86.225.152
Type
VPN
Country
🇨🇳 China
City
Suzhou
ISP
China Unicom CHINA169 Jiangsu Province Network
Organization
Unknown
Autonomous System
AS4837 CHINA UNICOM China169 Backbone
Hit Count
191
02

Detection Signatures

SignatureDescriptionPointsSeverity
404 ratio 40-60%Majority of requests returned 404 — enumeration+15
Danger strong hits: 2High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+50
Foreign refererReferer from unrelated external domain+10
Probe 302→404Behavioral anomaly detected by automated analysis+20
Σ = 95
03

Observed Activity

Reconstructed HTTP requests from server access logs. Target domains redacted for security.

[redacted]
GET
/
200
Requests shown: 1 · HTTP 404: 0 · Dangerous patterns: 0

* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.

04

Timeline

2026-08-30 16:04:34
First malicious request detected
IP entered monitoring from server access logs
During observation
Multiple detection signatures triggered
404 ratio 40-60% (+15), Danger strong hits: 2 (+50), Foreign referer (+10)
2026-09-06 01:02:46
Last malicious request observed
Total score reached: 95/100
Next cycle
IP blocked — all subsequent requests denied (HTTP 403)
Added to blocklist automatically
05

Network Provider

China Unicom CHINA169 Jiangsu Province Network
AS4837 · 🇨🇳 China
06

Recommendations

Actions taken & recommended

  • IP 112.86.225.152 is blocked at application level (HTTP 403)
  • Consider blocking at firewall level (iptables/CSF) to reduce server load
  • Other malicious IPs detected in the same /24 subnet — consider blocking 112.86.225.0/24
  • Report abuse to the network provider via their abuse contact
  • Ensure sensitive files (.env, .git, backups) are not accessible from the web

🔎 Path Enumeration Protection

Block scanning from 112.86.225.152: rate-limit 404 responses per IP, deploy a honeypot 404 page, ensure no backup files are web-accessible.

07

Neighbors in 112.86.225.0/24

Other blocked IPs from the same /24 subnet — indicates systematic abuse from this network range.

09

Blacklist Status (DNSBL)

This IP was checked against major DNS-based blacklists used by mail servers and firewalls worldwide.

✓ Clean
dnsbl.dronebl.org
✓ Clean
psbl.surriel.com
✓ Clean
b.barracudacentral.org
✓ Clean
bl.blocklist.de
✓ Clean
zen.spamhaus.org
✓ Clean
spam.dnsbl.sorbs.net
✓ Clean
cbl.abuseat.org

Checked: Spamhaus, SpamCop, Barracuda, SORBS, CBL, UCEProtect. Results may change over time.

10

Threat Analysis

112.86.225.152 has been assigned a threat score of 95/100 (Critical). A score this high marks a critical threat actor. This address has demonstrated persistent, aggressive malicious behavior across multiple detection vectors.

The following attack categories were identified:

Path Enumeration

📊 Threat Analysis

Our monitoring infrastructure has identified 112.86.225.152, geolocated to Suzhou, China, operating on the network of China Unicom CHINA169 Jiangsu Province Network, as a source of suspicious network activity. The address has been active for 6 days in our monitoring system, producing 191 flagged requests at a rate of ~31.8/day. This IP is identified as a VPN or proxy endpoint, commonly used to mask the true origin of attack traffic and bypass geographic or reputation-based blocking. The IP exhibits directory enumeration behavior, systematically requesting non-existent paths to discover hidden files and misconfigured resources. China currently accounts for 204 blocked IPs in our database, making it a significant source of malicious traffic. At 95/100, this is an extremely high-risk address. All traffic should be considered hostile.

This IP is associated with a VPN or proxy service. Attackers frequently route their traffic through anonymizing services to obscure their true location. This makes attribution more challenging but the malicious behavior patterns remain detectable.

11

Related Threats

🇨🇳 Top threats from China

180.184.55.222 (340)82.157.132.42 (310)101.200.57.251 (310)118.25.236.48 (280)117.72.204.101 (280)View all →

🏢 Same network: AS4837

121.30.148.185 (145)221.194.165.155 (145)221.194.165.156 (145)121.30.148.183 (145)116.255.203.164 (145)View all →
12

Security Intelligence

💡 Remote Code Execution (RCE)

RCE vulnerabilities allow attackers to execute arbitrary code on target servers. These critical flaws often arise from deserialization bugs, template injection, or file upload vulnerabilities, and represent the highest severity class of web application weaknesses.

💡 Content Security Policy Implementation

Content Security Policy headers instruct browsers to restrict resource loading, mitigating XSS and data injection attacks. Properly configured CSP policies prevent inline script execution, restrict iframe embedding, and control which domains can serve content.

🔍 Check Any IP Address

Share this report: