ABUSE.MOM
THREAT REPORT

IP Threat Report
112.214.39.156

ABUSE.MOM — BEHAVE OR GET EXPOSED

Generated: 2026-05-27 20:37:01
First seen: 2026-03-04 16:00:05
Last seen: 2026-03-04 16:00:05
103

⛔ Verdict: BLOCK

This IP address has been classified as a source of malicious automated activity. Threat score: 103/100. Total malicious requests observed: 1.

DANGER_PATHMETHOD
01

Geolocation & Classification

IP Address
112.214.39.156
Type
Residential
Country
🇰🇷 South Korea
City
Geumcheon-gu
ISP
DLIVE
Organization
DLIVE Guro Cable TV
Autonomous System
AS10036 DLIVE
Hit Count
1
02

Detection Signatures

SignatureDescriptionPointsSeverity
Danger strong hits: 3High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+75
Danger medium hits: 2Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+20
POST requests presentBehavioral anomaly detected by automated analysis+8
Σ = 103
03

Observed Activity

Reconstructed HTTP requests from server access logs. Target domains redacted for security.

[redacted]
GET
/
200
Requests shown: 1 · HTTP 404: 0 · Dangerous patterns: 0

* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.

04

Timeline

2026-03-04 16:00:05
First malicious request detected
IP entered monitoring from server access logs
During observation
Multiple detection signatures triggered
Danger strong hits: 3 (+75), Danger medium hits: 2 (+20), POST requests present (+8)
2026-03-04 16:00:05
Last malicious request observed
Total score reached: 103/100
Next cycle
IP blocked — all subsequent requests denied (HTTP 403)
Added to blocklist automatically
05

Network Provider

DLIVE
AS10036 · 🇰🇷 South Korea
06

Recommendations

Actions taken & recommended

  • IP 112.214.39.156 is blocked at application level (HTTP 403)
  • Consider blocking at firewall level (iptables/CSF) to reduce server load
  • Report abuse to the network provider via their abuse contact
  • Ensure sensitive files (.env, .git, backups) are not accessible from the web

⚙️ Defensive Recommendations

Block 112.214.39.156 at the network perimeter. Implement defense-in-depth combining IP blocking with application-layer protections.

09

Blacklist Status (DNSBL)

This IP was checked against major DNS-based blacklists used by mail servers and firewalls worldwide.

✓ Clean
Spamhaus ZEN

Checked: Spamhaus, SpamCop, Barracuda, SORBS, CBL, UCEProtect. Results may change over time.

10

Threat Analysis

112.214.39.156 has been assigned a threat score of 103/100 (Critical). This places it in the critical threat category. Immediate blocking is strongly advised across all network perimeters.

📊 Threat Analysis

112.214.39.156 is registered in Geumcheon-gu, South Korea, operating on the network of DLIVE. This IP first appeared in our threat feeds after triggering multiple behavioral detection signatures. Over a period of 1 days, this IP generated 1 malicious requests, averaging approximately 1 requests per day. This residential IP is likely a compromised consumer device. Home routers and IoT equipment with default credentials are prime targets for botnet operators. With 101 flagged addresses, South Korea represents a significant presence in our threat database. A score of 103/100 places this address in the top tier of severity. Block and investigate any historical connections.

This IP is classified as residential, suggesting it may belong to a compromised home device, IoT botnet member, or an infected personal computer. Residential IPs involved in attacks often indicate malware infection without the owner's knowledge.

11

Related Threats

🇰🇷 Top threats from South Korea

4.217.180.34 (280)20.214.155.242 (280)20.214.157.214 (280)52.231.66.246 (280)20.194.25.241 (280)View all →

🏢 Same network: AS10036

View all →
12

Security Intelligence

💡 Vulnerability Scanning Explained

Vulnerability scanning is the automated process of probing web applications for known weaknesses. Attackers use tools like Nuclei, Nikto, and ZAP to test thousands of hosts per hour, looking for exposed configuration files, outdated software, and default credentials.

💡 GeoIP Blocking Considerations

Blocking traffic from specific countries reduces attack surface but impacts legitimate international users. Effective geo-based policies use tiered approaches — blocking, rate limiting, or requiring additional verification based on risk assessment.

🔍 Check Any IP Address

Share this report: