ABUSE.MOM
THREAT REPORT

IP Threat Report
111.58.238.67

ABUSE.MOM — BEHAVE OR GET EXPOSED

Generated: 2026-05-30 07:12:03
First seen: 2026-05-01 20:00:04
Last seen: 2026-05-01 20:00:04
70

⛔ Verdict: BLOCK

This IP address has been classified as a source of malicious automated activity. Threat score: 70/100. Total malicious requests observed: 1.

BURST
01

Geolocation & Classification

IP Address
111.58.238.67
Type
Mobile
Country
🇨🇳 China
City
Guangzhou
ISP
China Mobile communications corporation
Organization
China Mobile
Autonomous System
AS9808 China Mobile Communications Group Co., Ltd.
Hit Count
1
02

Detection Signatures

SignatureDescriptionPointsSeverity
Burst: 9 req / 2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst: 11 req / 10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Σ = 70
03

Observed Activity

Reconstructed HTTP requests from server access logs. Target domains redacted for security.

[redacted]
GET
/
200
[redacted]
GET
/page
200
Requests shown: 2 · HTTP 404: 0 · Dangerous patterns: 0

* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.

04

Timeline

2026-05-01 20:00:04
First malicious request detected
IP entered monitoring from server access logs
During observation
Multiple detection signatures triggered
Burst: 9 req / 2s (+35), Burst: 11 req / 10s (+35)
2026-05-01 20:00:04
Last malicious request observed
Total score reached: 70/100
Next cycle
IP blocked — all subsequent requests denied (HTTP 403)
Added to blocklist automatically
05

Network Provider

China Mobile communications corporation
AS9808 · 🇨🇳 China
06

Recommendations

Actions taken & recommended

  • IP 111.58.238.67 is blocked at application level (HTTP 403)
  • Consider blocking at firewall level (iptables/CSF) to reduce server load
  • Report abuse to the network provider via their abuse contact
  • Ensure sensitive files (.env, .git, backups) are not accessible from the web

🌊 Traffic Flood Defense

IP 111.58.238.67 is generating excessive traffic. Limit connections per source IP. Enable geographic blocking if traffic from this region is unexpected.

09

Blacklist Status (DNSBL)

This IP was checked against major DNS-based blacklists used by mail servers and firewalls worldwide.

⛔ LISTED
zen.spamhaus.org
✓ Clean
ix.dnsbl.manitu.net
✓ Clean
dnsbl.sorbs.net
✓ Clean
bl.spamcop.net
✓ Clean
dnsbl-1.uceprotect.net
✓ Clean
b.barracudacentral.org
✓ Clean
psbl.surriel.com
✓ Clean
truncate.gbudb.net

Checked: Spamhaus, SpamCop, Barracuda, SORBS, CBL, UCEProtect. Results may change over time.

10

Threat Analysis

111.58.238.67 has been assigned a threat score of 70/100 (High). This score indicates high threat severity. The IP has shown clear patterns of malicious behavior that warrant immediate defensive measures.

The following attack categories were identified:

Request Flooding

📊 Threat Analysis

Network traffic from 111.58.238.67, located in Guangzhou, China, operating on the network of China Mobile communications corporation, has been classified as malicious by our automated threat scoring engine. Our sensors captured 1 malicious requests from this address across a 1-day span, reflecting a sustained attack cadence of ~1 requests per day. This is a mobile network IP. While mobile addresses are typically shared via CGNAT, persistent malicious activity from this specific address suggests automated abuse. The IP is engaged in request flooding, sending traffic at rates designed to exhaust server capacity. With 167 flagged addresses, China represents a significant presence in our threat database. A threat score of 70/100 places this IP in the high-risk category. Blocking at the firewall level is recommended.

11

Related Threats

🇨🇳 Top threats from China

180.184.55.222 (340)117.50.120.215 (235)115.191.1.205 (235)123.58.16.244 (235)43.142.47.248 (230)View all →

🏢 Same network: AS9808

183.207.48.161 (230)36.212.132.184 (220)117.156.171.166 (200)112.51.229.143 (180)36.138.252.97 (170)View all →
12

Security Intelligence

💡 DDoS Mitigation Approaches

Distributed denial of service attacks overwhelm infrastructure with traffic volume. Effective mitigation combines always-on traffic scrubbing, anycast network distribution, rate limiting, and the ability to quickly scale absorption capacity during attacks.

💡 Responsible Disclosure Ethics

Responsible disclosure balances public safety with giving vendors time to patch vulnerabilities. The security community generally supports coordinated disclosure timelines, but disagreements about appropriate timeframes and full disclosure continue to drive policy debates.

🔍 Check Any IP Address

Share this report: