ABUSE.MOM
THREAT REPORT

IP Threat Report
104.46.232.28

ABUSE.MOM — BEHAVE OR GET EXPOSED

Generated: 2026-10-24 18:09:00
First seen: 2026-10-02 16:45:23
Last seen: 2026-10-18 00:10:24
280

⛔ Verdict: BLOCK

This IP address has been classified as a source of malicious automated activity. Threat score: 280/100. Total malicious requests observed: 3295.

BURSTDANGER_PATHRATIO_404REDIRECT_PROBEUA_SUS
01

Geolocation & Classification

IP Address
104.46.232.28
Type
Hosting
Country
🇯🇵 Japan
City
Osaka
ISP
Microsoft Corporation
Organization
Microsoft Azure Cloud (japanwest)
Autonomous System
AS8075 Microsoft Corporation
Hit Count
3295
02

Detection Signatures

SignatureDescriptionPointsSeverity
404 ratio 40-60%Majority of requests returned 404 — enumeration+15
404 ratio >= 60%Majority of requests returned 404 — enumeration+25
Burst 11/2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 38/10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 39/10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 40/10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 41/10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Danger medium hits: 106Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Danger medium hits: 110Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Danger medium hits: 135Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Danger medium hits: 138Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Danger medium hits: 140Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Danger medium hits: 141Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Danger medium hits: 158Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Danger medium hits: 160Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Danger medium hits: 162Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Danger medium hits: 164Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Danger medium hits: 188Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Danger medium hits: 198Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Danger medium hits: 200Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Danger medium hits: 210Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Danger medium hits: 216Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Danger medium hits: 237Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Danger medium hits: 240Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Danger medium hits: 242Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Danger medium hits: 243Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Danger medium hits: 260Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Danger medium hits: 268Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Danger medium hits: 298Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Danger medium hits: 442Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Danger medium hits: 79Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Danger medium hits: 84Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Danger medium hits: 90Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Danger medium hits: 94Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Danger strong hits: 10High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
Danger strong hits: 12High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
Danger strong hits: 2High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+50
Danger strong hits: 3High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+75
Danger strong hits: 4High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
Danger strong hits: 6High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
Danger strong hits: 7High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
Danger strong hits: 8High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
Danger strong hits: 9High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
Probe 302→404Behavioral anomaly detected by automated analysis+20
UA suspiciousBehavioral anomaly detected by automated analysis+15
Σ = 2695
03

Observed Activity

Reconstructed HTTP requests from server access logs. Target domains redacted for security.

[redacted]
GET
/
200
[redacted]
GET
/page
200
Requests shown: 2 · HTTP 404: 0 · Dangerous patterns: 0

* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.

04

Timeline

2026-10-02 16:45:23
First malicious request detected
IP entered monitoring from server access logs
During observation
Multiple detection signatures triggered
404 ratio 40-60% (+15), 404 ratio >= 60% (+25), Burst 11/2s (+35)
2026-10-18 00:10:24
Last malicious request observed
Total score reached: 280/100
Next cycle
IP blocked — all subsequent requests denied (HTTP 403)
Added to blocklist automatically
05

Network Provider

Microsoft Corporation
AS8075 · 🇯🇵 Japan

We have detected 1852 malicious IPs from this autonomous system.

View all IPs from AS8075 →
06

Recommendations

Actions taken & recommended

  • IP 104.46.232.28 is blocked at application level (HTTP 403)
  • Consider blocking at firewall level (iptables/CSF) to reduce server load
  • Report abuse to the network provider via their abuse contact
  • Ensure sensitive files (.env, .git, backups) are not accessible from the web

🔎 Directory Scan Defense

IP 104.46.232.28 is enumerating directories. Configure fail2ban apache-404 jail after 10+ 404 errors. Disable directory listings. Normalize all 404 responses.

🌊 Traffic Flood Defense

IP 104.46.232.28 is generating excessive traffic. Limit connections per source IP. Enable geographic blocking if traffic from this region is unexpected.

🤖 User-Agent Anomaly Defense

IP 104.46.232.28 shows suspicious UA behavior. Block empty User-Agent requests. Implement JavaScript-based bot detection for sensitive endpoints.

09

Blacklist Status (DNSBL)

This IP was checked against major DNS-based blacklists used by mail servers and firewalls worldwide.

✓ Clean
cbl.abuseat.org
✓ Clean
psbl.surriel.com
✓ Clean
spam.dnsbl.sorbs.net
✓ Clean
bl.blocklist.de
✓ Clean
zen.spamhaus.org
✓ Clean
dnsbl.dronebl.org
✓ Clean
b.barracudacentral.org

Checked: Spamhaus, SpamCop, Barracuda, SORBS, CBL, UCEProtect. Results may change over time.

10

Threat Analysis

104.46.232.28 has been assigned a threat score of 280/100 (Critical). This represents a critical risk level. Our detection systems have flagged multiple high-confidence indicators of malicious intent from this address.

The following attack categories were identified:

Path EnumerationRequest FloodingUser-Agent Anomaly

📊 Threat Analysis

Our monitoring infrastructure has identified 104.46.232.28, geolocated to Osaka, Japan, operating on the network of Microsoft Corporation, as a source of suspicious network activity. Over a period of 15 days, this IP generated 3,295 malicious requests, averaging approximately 219.7 requests per day. Classified as a hosting IP, this address likely runs on a rented server or cloud instance. Attackers prefer datacenter IPs for their high bandwidth and disposable nature. The combination of 3 distinct attack vectors indicates a sophisticated, multi-pronged threat actor deploying automated tools that probe multiple attack surfaces simultaneously. Japan currently accounts for 1,341 blocked IPs in our database, making it a major source of malicious traffic. A score of 280/100 places this address in the top tier of severity. Block and investigate any historical connections.

This IP belongs to a hosting or data center provider. Malicious traffic from hosting infrastructure often originates from compromised VPS instances, rented servers used for scanning campaigns, or abused free-tier cloud accounts. Hosting providers typically respond to abuse reports within 24-72 hours.

11

Related Threats

🇯🇵 Top threats from Japan

103.163.220.216 (340)35.189.151.182 (320)168.110.63.243 (320)168.110.58.114 (320)129.225.172.187 (310)View all →

🏢 Same network: AS8075

68.155.155.199 (320)20.127.136.245 (318)20.151.200.44 (315)20.92.77.159 (310)20.210.128.125 (310)View all →
12

Security Intelligence

💡 DDoS Mitigation Approaches

Distributed denial of service attacks overwhelm infrastructure with traffic volume. Effective mitigation combines always-on traffic scrubbing, anycast network distribution, rate limiting, and the ability to quickly scale absorption capacity during attacks.

💡 Tor Exit Node Detection

Tor exit nodes are publicly listed but constantly rotating. While Tor serves essential privacy functions for journalists and activists, it is also used to anonymize attacks. Effective security policies differentiate between blocking and monitoring Tor traffic.

🔍 Check Any IP Address

Share this report: