ABUSE.MOM
THREAT REPORT

IP Threat Report
104.46.226.22

ABUSE.MOM — BEHAVE OR GET EXPOSED

Generated: 2026-05-30 12:26:26
First seen: 2026-02-20 21:40:04
Last seen: 2026-02-23 21:00:06
280

⛔ Verdict: BLOCK

This IP address has been classified as a source of malicious automated activity. Threat score: 280/100. Total malicious requests observed: 65.

UA_SUSDANGER_PATHBURSTREDIRECT_PROBERATIO_404
01

Geolocation & Classification

IP Address
104.46.226.22
Type
Hosting
Country
🇯🇵 Japan
City
Osaka
ISP
Microsoft Corporation
Organization
Microsoft Azure Cloud (japanwest)
Autonomous System
AS8075 Microsoft Corporation
Hit Count
65
02

Detection Signatures

SignatureDescriptionPointsSeverity
UA suspicious (short/empty)Behavioral anomaly detected by automated analysis+15
Danger strong hits: 42High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
Danger medium hits: 136Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Burst: 12 req / 2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst: 38 req / 10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Danger strong hits: 32High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
Danger medium hits: 142Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Burst: 40 req / 10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Danger strong hits: 54High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
Danger medium hits: 149Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Danger strong hits: 24High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
Danger medium hits: 131Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Burst: 41 req / 10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Danger strong hits: 68High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
Danger medium hits: 350Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Danger strong hits: 51High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
Danger medium hits: 233Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Burst: 13 req / 2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst: 46 req / 10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Danger strong hits: 9High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
Danger medium hits: 14Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Burst: 11 req / 2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst: 20 req / 10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Danger strong hits: 69High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
Danger medium hits: 266Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Burst: 44 req / 10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Danger strong hits: 222High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
Danger medium hits: 443Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Probe pattern 302->404 same pathBehavioral anomaly detected by automated analysis+20
Burst: 43 req / 10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Danger strong hits: 14High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
Danger medium hits: 153Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
404 ratio 40-60%Majority of requests returned 404 — enumeration+15
Danger strong hits: 20High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
Danger medium hits: 82Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Danger strong hits: 71High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
Danger medium hits: 125Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Burst: 45 req / 10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Danger strong hits: 78High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
Danger medium hits: 280Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Burst: 47 req / 10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Danger strong hits: 151High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
Danger medium hits: 310Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Danger strong hits: 4High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
Danger medium hits: 46Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Burst: 42 req / 10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Danger strong hits: 64High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
Danger medium hits: 307Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Danger strong hits: 3High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+75
Danger medium hits: 11Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Burst: 16 req / 10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Danger strong hits: 48High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
Danger medium hits: 224Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Danger strong hits: 156High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
Danger medium hits: 291Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Danger strong hits: 65High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
Danger medium hits: 152Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Danger medium hits: 235Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Danger strong hits: 196High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
Danger medium hits: 399Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Danger strong hits: 26High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
Danger medium hits: 44Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Danger strong hits: 52High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
Danger strong hits: 18High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
Danger medium hits: 72Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Danger strong hits: 158High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
Danger medium hits: 442Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Danger medium hits: 444Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Danger strong hits: 190High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
Danger medium hits: 383Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Danger medium hits: 227Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Danger medium hits: 60Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Danger strong hits: 34High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
Danger strong hits: 44High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
Danger strong hits: 87High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
Danger medium hits: 150Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Danger medium hits: 341Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Burst: 39 req / 10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Danger medium hits: 26Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Burst: 35 req / 10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Danger medium hits: 197Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Danger medium hits: 339Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Σ = 5525
03

Observed Activity

Reconstructed HTTP requests from server access logs. Target domains redacted for security.

[redacted]
GET
/
200
[redacted]
GET
/page
200
Requests shown: 2 · HTTP 404: 0 · Dangerous patterns: 0

* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.

04

Timeline

2026-02-20 21:40:04
First malicious request detected
IP entered monitoring from server access logs
During observation
Multiple detection signatures triggered
UA suspicious (short/empty) (+15), Danger strong hits: 42 (+100), Danger medium hits: 136 (+60)
2026-02-23 21:00:06
Last malicious request observed
Total score reached: 280/100
Next cycle
IP blocked — all subsequent requests denied (HTTP 403)
Added to blocklist automatically
05

Network Provider

Microsoft Corporation
AS8075 · 🇯🇵 Japan
06

Recommendations

Actions taken & recommended

  • IP 104.46.226.22 is blocked at application level (HTTP 403)
  • Consider blocking at firewall level (iptables/CSF) to reduce server load
  • Report abuse to the network provider via their abuse contact
  • Ensure sensitive files (.env, .git, backups) are not accessible from the web

🤖 Bot Detection

Address UA spoofing from 104.46.226.22: maintain blocklist of known malicious UA strings, require consistent UA across sessions, implement TLS fingerprinting.

🌊 Flood / DDoS Mitigation

Implement limit_req_zone in nginx. Deploy CDN with DDoS protection. Configure SYN cookies and connection tracking to throttle 104.46.226.22.

🔎 Path Enumeration Protection

Block scanning from 104.46.226.22: rate-limit 404 responses per IP, deploy a honeypot 404 page, ensure no backup files are web-accessible.

09

Blacklist Status (DNSBL)

This IP was checked against major DNS-based blacklists used by mail servers and firewalls worldwide.

⛔ LISTED
Spamhaus ZEN

Checked: Spamhaus, SpamCop, Barracuda, SORBS, CBL, UCEProtect. Results may change over time.

10

Threat Analysis

104.46.226.22 has been assigned a threat score of 280/100 (Critical). With this rating, the IP falls into the critical severity bracket — among the most dangerous addresses in our monitoring database.

The following attack categories were identified:

User-Agent AnomalyRequest FloodingPath Enumeration

📊 Threat Analysis

IP address 104.46.226.22 has been traced to Osaka, Japan, operating on the network of Microsoft Corporation. Our threat detection systems have flagged this address based on observed malicious behavior patterns. The address has been active for 2 days in our monitoring system, producing 65 flagged requests at a rate of ~32.5/day. Classified as a hosting IP, this address likely runs on a rented server or cloud instance. Attackers prefer datacenter IPs for their high bandwidth and disposable nature. With 3 different attack patterns detected, this IP exhibits behavior characteristic of advanced automated scanning frameworks. With 110 flagged addresses, Japan represents a significant presence in our threat database. A score of 280/100 places this address in the top tier of severity. Block and investigate any historical connections.

This IP belongs to a hosting or data center provider. Malicious traffic from hosting infrastructure often originates from compromised VPS instances, rented servers used for scanning campaigns, or abused free-tier cloud accounts. Hosting providers typically respond to abuse reports within 24-72 hours.

11

Related Threats

🇯🇵 Top threats from Japan

103.163.220.216 (340)35.243.110.60 (288)20.89.56.154 (280)20.27.221.169 (280)20.210.188.132 (280)View all →

🏢 Same network: AS8075

20.89.56.154 (280)20.27.221.169 (280)20.210.188.132 (280)20.194.153.120 (280)104.46.236.39 (280)View all →
12

Security Intelligence

💡 TLS Fingerprinting (JA3/JA4)

TLS fingerprinting creates unique identifiers based on how clients negotiate encrypted connections. The JA3 and JA4 methods generate hashes from TLS ClientHello parameters, enabling identification of specific tools and malware regardless of IP address changes.

💡 Command Injection Techniques

Command injection occurs when attackers insert operating system commands through application inputs. Successful exploitation grants direct server access, enabling data theft, malware installation, and lateral movement across networks.

🔍 Check Any IP Address

Share this report: