
ABUSE.MOM — BEHAVE OR GET EXPOSED
| Signature | Description | Points | Severity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Directory Scan | Behavioral anomaly detected by automated analysis | +0 |
Reconstructed HTTP requests from server access logs. Target domains redacted for security.
* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.
Block 103.178.134.84 at the network perimeter. Implement defense-in-depth combining IP blocking with application-layer protections.
Other blocked IPs from the same /24 subnet — indicates systematic abuse from this network range.
This IP was checked against major DNS-based blacklists used by mail servers and firewalls worldwide.
Checked: Spamhaus, SpamCop, Barracuda, SORBS, CBL, UCEProtect. Results may change over time.
103.178.134.84 has been assigned a threat score of 78/100 (High). At this threat level, the IP is considered high risk. Firewall rules should be updated to deny traffic from this source.
Our monitoring infrastructure has identified 103.178.134.84, geolocated to Mumbai, India, operating on the network of Prism Infocom LLP, as a source of suspicious network activity. During its 1-day observation window, we recorded 28 hostile requests from this IP — roughly 28 per day on average. The address belongs to a mobile carrier network. The sustained pattern of malicious requests indicates either a compromised device or deliberate abuse. India currently accounts for 105 blocked IPs in our database, making it a significant source of malicious traffic. The score of 78/100 indicates a confirmed malicious actor. Network-level blocking is appropriate.
IP geolocation databases provide approximate locations with varying accuracy. City-level geolocation is typically 50-80% accurate, while country-level exceeds 95%. VPNs, proxies, and mobile networks further reduce reliability, making geolocation a useful but imperfect intelligence signal.
Analyzing attack patterns at the AS (Autonomous System) level reveals which networks harbor the most malicious activity. Some ASes have abuse rates orders of magnitude higher than average, indicating lax enforcement of acceptable use policies.