
ABUSE.MOM — COMPÓRTATE O SERÁS EXPUESTO
| Firma | Descripción | Puntos | Gravedad |
|---|---|---|---|
| UA suspicious (short/empty) | Anomalía de comportamiento detectada automáticamente | +15 | |
| Danger strong hits: 2 | Rutas de alto riesgo: shells, RCE, exploits | +50 | |
| 404 ratio 40-60% | Mayoría de solicitudes devolvieron 404 — enumeración | +15 | |
| Probe pattern 302->404 same path | Anomalía de comportamiento detectada automáticamente | +20 | |
| Imported from old blocklist | Anomalía de comportamiento detectada automáticamente | +0 |
Solicitudes HTTP reconstruidas de los registros del servidor. Dominios objetivo ocultos por seguridad.
* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.
IP 8.219.87.97 muestra comportamiento UA sospechoso. Bloquee solicitudes con User-Agent vacío.
IP 8.219.87.97 está enumerando directorios. Configure fail2ban con jail apache-404 tras 10+ errores 404.
Datos de reconocimiento de red de Shodan. Los puertos abiertos pueden indicar servicios en ejecución, configuraciones incorrectas o superficies de ataque.
| Port | Service | Risk | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 22 | SSH | Low | Secure Shell — common brute force target for remote access |
| 1013 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 1013 |
| 1022 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 1022 |
| 1023 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 1023 |
| 1024 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 1024 |
| 1025 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 1025 |
| 1027 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 1027 |
| 1080 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 1080 |
| 1099 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 1099 |
| 1110 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 1110 |
| 1153 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 1153 |
| 1181 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 1181 |
| 1195 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 1195 |
| 1198 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 1198 |
| 1200 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 1200 |
| 1207 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 1207 |
| 1234 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 1234 |
| 1291 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 1291 |
| 1292 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 1292 |
| 1311 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 1311 |
| 1337 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 1337 |
| 1388 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 1388 |
| 1400 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 1400 |
| 1414 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 1414 |
| 1433 | MSSQL | High | Service on port 1433 |
| 1443 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 1443 |
| 1444 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 1444 |
| 1447 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 1447 |
| 1451 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 1451 |
| 1454 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 1454 |
| 1457 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 1457 |
| 1471 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 1471 |
| 1521 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 1521 |
| 1554 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 1554 |
| 1599 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 1599 |
| 1604 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 1604 |
| 1605 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 1605 |
| 1650 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 1650 |
| 1723 | PPTP | Low | Service on port 1723 |
| 1741 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 1741 |
| 1801 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 1801 |
| 1911 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 1911 |
| 1925 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 1925 |
| 1926 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 1926 |
| 1935 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 1935 |
| 1962 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 1962 |
| 1965 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 1965 |
| 1966 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 1966 |
| 1970 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 1970 |
| 3389 | RDP | High | Remote Desktop Protocol — primary target for ransomware attacks |
⚠️ Se detectaron 1 puerto de alto riesgo en 8.219.87.97. RDP expuesto (3389) es el vector #1 para ataques de ransomware. Estos servicios no deben ser accesibles públicamente sin reglas estrictas de firewall.
| CVE ID | Link |
|---|---|
| CVE-2020-14145 | NVD → |
| CVE-2023-51767 | NVD → |
| CVE-2025-26465 | NVD → |
| CVE-2023-51385 | NVD → |
| CVE-2023-38408 | NVD → |
| CVE-2008-3844 | NVD → |
| CVE-2007-2768 | NVD → |
| CVE-2016-20012 | NVD → |
| CVE-2018-15473 | NVD → |
| CVE-2018-20685 | NVD → |
| CVE-2023-48795 | NVD → |
| CVE-2025-32728 | NVD → |
| CVE-2021-41617 | NVD → |
| CVE-2020-15778 | NVD → |
| CVE-2019-6109 | NVD → |
| CVE-2018-15919 | NVD → |
| CVE-2021-36368 | NVD → |
| CVE-2019-6111 | NVD → |
| CVE-2017-15906 | NVD → |
| CVE-2019-6110 | NVD → |
🔴 Este host tiene 20 CVE conocidos asociados con sus servicios expuestos. Este volumen sugiere software severamente desactualizado. Revise cada CVE en la base de datos NVD.
Fuente: Shodan InternetDB. Escaneado independientemente de abuse.mom.
Esta IP fue verificada contra las principales listas negras DNS utilizadas por servidores de correo y firewalls.
Verificado: Spamhaus, SpamCop, Barracuda, SORBS, CBL, UCEProtect.
8.219.87.97 has been assigned a threat score of 100/100 (Critical). Esta es una amenaza de nivel crítico. Los administradores de sistemas deben tratar esta IP como hostil y bloquear todas las conexiones entrantes sin excepción.
The following attack categories were identified:
8.219.87.97 está registrada en Singapore, Singapore, operando en la red de Alibaba (US) Technology Co., Ltd.. Esta IP apareció por primera vez en nuestros feeds de amenazas tras activar múltiples firmas de detección conductual. La dirección ha estado activa durante 1 días en nuestro sistema de monitoreo, produciendo 3 solicitudes marcadas a una tasa de ~3/día. La dirección está clasificada como residencial. La actividad maliciosa desde IPs residenciales típicamente indica compromiso del dispositivo o membresía en botnet. Se identificaron dos patrones de ataque (User-Agent Anomaly y Path Enumeration), sugiriendo una campaña semi-automatizada que apunta a múltiples vulnerabilidades. Singapore actualmente representa 107 IPs bloqueadas en nuestra base de datos, siendo una fuente significativa de tráfico malicioso. Una puntuación de 100/100 coloca esta dirección en el nivel más alto de severidad.
This IP is classified as residential, suggesting it may belong to a compromised home device, IoT botnet member, or an infected personal computer. Residential IPs involved in attacks often indicate malware infection without the owner's knowledge.
Analyzing User-Agent strings reveals automated tools masquerading as legitimate browsers. Inconsistencies between claimed browser capabilities and actual behavior, impossible version combinations, and known scanner signatures help identify malicious clients.
Standards like STIX/TAXII, MISP, and OpenIOC enable automated sharing of threat intelligence between organizations. Collective defense through shared indicators, tactics, and procedures strengthens the entire security community against common threats.